Path: csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Michael Kesper Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Updating Flask to 3.x? Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 13:20:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Dec 18 12:18:11 2023 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.31 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -4.6 X-Greylist: delayed 305 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 11:59:53 UTC MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US, de-DE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/21316 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/d70a1185-7170-4a15-88ba-ad2daa0995d7@familie-kesper.de Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 33 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 12:54:44 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:15369 Hi Carsten, Am 17.12.23 um 10:06 schrieb Carsten Schoenert: > Hi, > > the Flask team released Flask and the depending package Werkzeug 3.0.0 > on 2023-09-30. > > Since Thomas Goirand did the last update of Flask to 2.2.x nearly one > year ago in preparation for the Bookworm release I've talked with Thomas > recently about updating Flask and depending packages again so we can get > Flask 3.x into the archive. > Thomas pointed out he will not have time to work on Flask 3 and some > depending packages in the near future. > > I usual try to keep an eye on some Flask related packages as we use them > on my day job. A few of them have now RC issues and are already kicked > out of testing. Solving these bug reports are now mostly depending on a > newer Flask version or at least it would be more useful to move over to > a recent Flask version. Sure, broken packages are no good for anybody. ... > Following a simple list of reverse deps for the resulting binary > packages. Any help, suggestion or useful hint in maintaining this Flask > update is really appreciated! Feel free to contact me if you need help! Best Michael