Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Christopher Hoskin Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: libbatik-java: Changed artifacts? Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 20:30:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Sat Sep 9 18:22:54 2017 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.319 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .gmail. - helo: .mail-qk0-f182.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -7 X-Google-Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KZW/tiKSjKxLrd29RljqIFfAEUXHgXP5cW7P2sVRTnE=; b=jRajSba3FnnPUtq7eRAmyLkCgnjXXhA8Im0aZr2njf0oRCCeAzs4wuUVyHwFcZFHTK lkew3JTm5IqDERWQacuAzGDsnuCy3TuvG4hCqUk4qnhxw+mUbJyjof5FWxj0f6hIsZSn JKvtZX8Ss+0RTEKe+JenxXYCvUWyOZ/cMONnjSCIRX07K07i1m3yPAz3ttvK72Eh7COf tZ0m7tB771B7rH9OKonAtawviwW01ettLOFhnfmtW+uGRNbVK6XsaJ8tb0O5wND5JgwL Bq3HhJvKxnfB1M6H4QJazCKwZgHfPLpor7NA9BGpy8vPvr6GFRTr9bS8dPl57Y6IRv8Y w5Xg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjUUYoXrQyi/jJOjdPpNXf5jCpLf5EoZtXywwKCoLh1yYRKuWAd TjCLLKewrY7xvYZ46BE= X-Received: by 10.55.162.7 with SMTP id l7mr5406172qke.154.1504981357590; Sat, 09 Sep 2017 11:22:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-SMTP-Source: AOwi7QD3cDNbos/G6LMx2oZrIl5kqaV8LnV0w1xyXfmSr3LfXiXKI1hyXItoLj9MTq4VCInT/T1NHR9COqSkTr1N83M= X-Received: by 10.200.22.201 with SMTP id y9mr9133940qtk.115.1504981356378; Sat, 09 Sep 2017 11:22:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/20356 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAEjvcd_JuuHM3AoC0p6-ajHVsCf9iu7-Ye8yuDOUiT3m_DzFug@mail.gmail.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 16 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Debian Java X-Original-Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2017 19:22:35 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <878thoyqnz.fsf@bitburger.home.felix> <87fubvvkdm.fsf@bitburger.home.felix> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:9992 > > One suggestion: If you update a library, it would be good to test > whether any r-dep fails to build. There are not many for the case of > batik. > Is there an automated way to rebuild all of the reverse dependencies of a package and see a summary of the outcome? libbatik-java has 25 immediate reverse dependencies which would take a while. It would be good to leave it running in the background whilst I do something else. (Yes I could write a script, but as developers must be updating libraries all the time, I suspect a well-polished one should already exist.) Christopher