Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java
Subject: Re: Notes from the DebConf 17 Java BOF
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 06:50:01 +0200
Message-ID: <uh9ix-5LP-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <ucnvQ-7US-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <udqrF-Hs-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <uf1yN-4Ab-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <ufemm-3Wk-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <ufoc1-29K-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Old-Return-Path: <tmancill@gmail.com>
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bkrgjysacr5shg7a"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 60
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:9933


--bkrgjysacr5shg7a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:10:01AM +0200, Frederic Bonnard wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:41:44 -0700, tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> wr=
ote:
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:01:26AM +0200, Frederic Bonnard wrote:
> > >=20
> > > and waiting for scala-tools-sbinary.
> >=20
> > I can have a look at scala-tools-sbinary.  I have gone ahead and
> > uploaded sbt to unstable [1] because I wanted to incorporate Chris
> > Lamb's reproducible builds patch.
>=20
> wow, thanks a lot Tony for both actions (I think I missed that
> reproducibility bug notification at some point :-=B0 )
>=20
> Well, I actually didn't know if somebody was having a look at
> scala-tools-sbinary at the moment or not, given that d/copyright may be
> huge and can take some time.
>=20
> If you have spare time for this, I'd be glad you help, but nothing
> urgent on my side.

Hello Frederic,

I'm still making my way through the packaging, but it looks fine so far.
It does feel very odd to upload source packages with those large
bootstrap dependency tarballs when some of the dependencies are already
in the archive. Can you remind me of what the plan is once everything
hits experimental/unstable?  I vaguely recall it being discussed, so a
pointer is fine.  I just want to understand what comes next.

Thank you,
tony

--bkrgjysacr5shg7a
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=tdoJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--bkrgjysacr5shg7a--