Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Emmanuel Bourg Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 12:20:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Tue Oct 24 10:19:41 2017 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.53 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -7 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/20482 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/666edbf1-e4d1-f138-cfde-095e7ceea437@apache.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 7 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 12:19:20 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <666edbf1-e4d1-f138-cfde-095e7ceea437@apache.org> X-Original-References: <7648af40-f4a8-e1f6-dd17-8c6f9deb5b05@apache.org> <25b2b8de-a126-cf6c-5adb-971983e5d739@debian.org> <5e17437c-3ad8-af1a-1446-d0cf191d9850@gmail.com> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:10114 Le 24/10/2017 à 09:09, 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan a écrit : > Why not keep the source package name as "openjfx" and then name the binary package "openjdk-9-jfx"? src:openjfx can't be reused for OpenJFX 9, because I need it to backport OpenJFX 8 updates for Stretch. Emmanuel Bourg