Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #10114

Re: OpenJFX 9 integration

Path	csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: OpenJFX 9 integration
Date	Tue, 24 Oct 2017 12:20:01 +0200
Message-ID	<uE4tr-1Aw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<uzUji-3ov-407@gated-at.bofh.it> <uDmsq-6XZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uDxxv-674-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uE1vz-8ee-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Tue Oct 24 10:19:41 2017
Old-Return-Path	<ebourg@apache.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-10.53 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -7
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language	en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Mailing-List	<debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20482
List-ID	<debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/666edbf1-e4d1-f138-cfde-095e7ceea437@apache.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	7
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Tue, 24 Oct 2017 12:19:20 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<666edbf1-e4d1-f138-cfde-095e7ceea437@apache.org>
X-Original-References	<7648af40-f4a8-e1f6-dd17-8c6f9deb5b05@apache.org> <25b2b8de-a126-cf6c-5adb-971983e5d739@debian.org> <a4b5457c-bdaf-b116-ed6b-2d97f2c398a1@apache.org> <5e17437c-3ad8-af1a-1446-d0cf191d9850@gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:10114

Show key headers only | View raw

Le 24/10/2017 à 09:09, 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan a écrit :
> Why not keep the source package name as "openjfx" and then name the binary package "openjdk-9-jfx"?

src:openjfx can't be reused for OpenJFX 9, because I need it to backport
OpenJFX 8 updates for Stretch.

Emmanuel Bourg

Thread

OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-13 00:40 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-17 17:20 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-17 21:20 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 13:20 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-22 17:30 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 21:00 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Mykola Nikishov <mn@mn.com.ua> - 2017-10-22 23:00 +0200
          Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 23:10 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-23 01:10 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 09:10 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-24 12:20 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> - 2018-04-04 07:20 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 10:00 +0200
          Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2018-04-04 10:30 +0200
            Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> - 2018-04-04 11:20 +0200
              Re: OpenJFX 9 integration tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 15:50 +0200
            Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 16:10 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration David Goodenough <david.goodenough@linkchoose.co.uk> - 2017-10-24 07:40 +0200

csiph-web