Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Luca Vercelli Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: plans for eclipse luna in debian Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:10:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Thorsten Glaser X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Tue Feb 16 20:04:46 2016 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.779 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .gmail. - helo: .mail-wm0-x22c.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -7 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NCn9/5ss9Wf2QUB/t2JfjPljrtJA4JqRcCaUMg5TfaE=; b=hFNy8Ho0iyfeqbIawq/0FoYaNNdFNp/eY0EfF+ClntB3lwhet8pKGKBGA4xygFas0m zK1WJLqHiCPvozXrFoYMebcqcz5+bJHndvoHduqVr7DXdOmNWdZYB0VgDnKT5uqM45f1 785WTdaLsDozssnNT4bGKJUHXGq0ZhgtKyyRkDrh1QfS3ebPY/w/IZZ+F8/bIndyg7l1 vFwEOn/jleboC6cXxHfzVXioRqzWlT82sSuQRK+zEtgPDAN+0kS+FpGHtLan5E3YtWJP YKVC5ISWCKCb2er7OPoZ7pqO6TQfzwXUZjWoazcaYudS+x0uU7pHM1GcmEVZQabiPxLB cygg== X-Google-Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NCn9/5ss9Wf2QUB/t2JfjPljrtJA4JqRcCaUMg5TfaE=; b=NSkyPlwJA8CXpHkZ1SHRnhC0kiRWh/3s3+9ujqcp9ky2X+fEt7SDF82r/NMSKohn/3 Xw67HDEiW9LEXUE9WD5w4xq3M/CltSJnpJ6Fi/sknyEJFV6K7zptH184lOvh//r6H/V5 rS+eSiGg474z6sBBU37qyqA+5UaFwjTaeOKMOJCgV0mXFLIYHE7K0xSuLqJMxgzOy7ty 5BrXQ7DXoel8OrqvO1PUf5treeW39VUW/wc5yr+MvIENDQNDd2koEd6UQXqUOqMp1bjA /JmSR4MLHG4aFiCwYW1mhVsoed/WQ1EO9L2VvqkqNAddEprINJBskqD472t6cU9H4rtC w7MQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTGGGZp/5EVjwm0c60r9TZzCvLB5fgLTF20icEsiitiJk5oljNlhBcPnzeOu7PvaA== X-Received: by 10.194.189.7 with SMTP id ge7mr24007731wjc.72.1455653069233; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:04:29 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/19195 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/56C380BC.4000107@gmail.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 34 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Christopher Hoskin , Markus Koschany , debian-java@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:04:12 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <56C380BC.4000107@gmail.com> X-Original-References: <551EA3D7.30105@onenetbeyond.org> <5617EEA7.6030803@gmail.com> <5617F732.6060202@gambaru.de> <562246E8.7050209@gmail.com> <5622636C.2030008@gambaru.de> <5623BF70.3040907@gambaru.de> <56261E4C.8010503@gmail.com> <56267489.3040909@gambaru.de> <5641E335.2060907@gmail.com> <56423C7A.7080509@gambaru.de> <5644853D.2060507@gmail.com> <56461911.1090907@gambaru.de> <566707FA.60506@gmail.com> <566DDFF8.6060007@debian.org> <568E56BC.3060302@gmail.com> <568E5DAB.80503@debian.org> <568E7689.7040407@gmail.com> <568E83EE.7040805@debian.org> <5699EFC5.50909@gmail.com> <56C35E02.5000807@gmail.com> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8873 Can you have different patches to source code, according to different profiles? If so, then probably it's possible to do what you say. Il 16/02/2016 20:57, Thorsten Glaser ha scritto: > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, Luca Vercelli wrote: > >> I don't know what are "build profiles" :( > Then ask before thinking ;-) > >> however I dont' think so, > Mayyyyybe. With build profiles, you have something similar to > Maven profiles in that you can: > > • have different Build-Depends (on the debian/control side) > • generate less and/or different binary packages > • have different code (in debian/rules you can switch on a new > environment variable DEB_BUILD_PROFILES so you can use two > (partially or even completely) different recipes for building > while using the same source > > This is intended especially for bootstrapping and cross-builds: > you first compile with the bootstrap profile enabled, then do > whatever is needed to get the full profile working, then build > it without the bootstrap profile, superseding the bootstrapping > upload. (It’s intended that way, to be used to break dependency > cycles and bootstrap, not to flavourise packages inside just one > distribution… though I wish I could have a distro-specific default > profile so there were no delta between Debian and the-derivate- > which-cannot-be-named-from-Canonical any more, for one of mine.) > > bye, > //mirabilos