Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.panservice.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Stephen Kitt Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: locale_in_documentation_generated_by_javadoc error in many java packages Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 09:00:03 +0100 Message-ID: References:

X-Original-To: debian-java@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Thu Nov 19 07:56:07 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, LONGWORD=2, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5 X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/.L0TDRZYrOl50ofw5oCOSiU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18891 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20151119085545.72f72bfc@heffalump.sk2.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 51 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 08:55:45 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <20151119085545.72f72bfc@heffalump.sk2.org> X-Original-References: <20150804210609.591F11ED96@jenkins.debian.net> <52754836-1536-456C-8511-1F89223D9945@hpe.com> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8572 --Sig_/.L0TDRZYrOl50ofw5oCOSiU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Tim, On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 03:04:09 +0000, "Potter, Tim (Converged Cloud)" wrote: > Hi everyone. I thought I=E2=80=99d try and fix these errors up as there = are > currently 169 packages affected, according to reproducible.debian.net. >=20 > However I can=E2=80=99t actually figure out what the problem looks like. = I=E2=80=99m > taking fest-assert as an example and the locale used by the reproducible > builder (fr_CH.UTF-8) does not appear anywhere in the .deb file. >=20 > Is there something more complex going on here or am I just begin dense? The issue is that the language used for the build appears in the generated docs; it's only the language, not the full locale: Regards, Stephen --Sig_/.L0TDRZYrOl50ofw5oCOSiU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWTYCHAAoJEIDTAvWIbYOcISwP/i4RrCheB9G9mWHfLvsEljSF IJOc2lSToYskXSlRIGOaq1riFGXLjodcO4IVHPNhQUJMhCUD080eEO4ucEvLgI8G dl6F8HiK+fb2up8ckmvs6RjvkAxafqDrVyAhZ3TYu7mayso4swxhf2fOVv3DvfGV iZ1hpjcgoBTuN/qXMxxjYPRFkyXoBYGOiotgOnXITWwwLxRPDblc1BCZAs64iGF1 nzZrMjf+atPA2m8fmsL44S0EzT72XaNI6ePvdxepJTocDaGlNlNYKW35NjQ9XC9l 4R/APExFKKXNBuTd+e0g/H4y37LiesXne1Ao4+Gxl4BqimaaalzAgjzfptom+5g7 gIZlpvEr6YZ6YXyEJU2U9CPybe7qvncLzxXFIv4cLwOv7SkNBykGaw2iFAnQvYf6 CmlirM6wjeRDa8weKokTAN9NMLJ83GboEFXUkVpX/yTKaANGvwDkA/dfkNfLVV0U iT9XCRP82SeESCm+EBAxgFYRSb6UpFTyd6Jx46c8IkJQKSC5kBfKAtyil1in+5XW H+UD8HyPr5OvqJXHqUjNm5hp5TqndXgqvsBoZzuN78ihH38ndwc4Sil54GCTTdfK TdMvmvY173PEAW5SKetqEQcID9ZEXHyLcGCaBgVkaSQuasYDI/KxoFGDxJshT2ZT iG3IlHhqM+0YybfZ6MVt =fyox -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/.L0TDRZYrOl50ofw5oCOSiU--