Path: csiph.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Pascal Rapicault Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: plans for eclipse luna in debian Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 08:50:03 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-java@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Mon Nov 2 07:47:22 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 BL_NJABL=SKIP(-1.5) CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .rapicorp. - helo: .mail-ig0-x22b.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -7 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rapicorp_com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DvF6mF2it8FcNZ25KVFKstW0pjoxoFYVEnhplX7cZt0=; b=ctBDndh5SZptAGvjXZ1HG0qnDq9jggCIQrzbpjXTNKnvWanzat/pGLlqs/IOr+oLHT tmi0VgySxUk6raU+pmmZg+uLzoXtAyjyixyEbrfzdIKIqokjGa4xKE80s6v/gecUa1QU LVVhw2kiS+82MBOCYgHtq5vFX7cZCv6Yu504YuDKiXYqNG0nSeUGz6CEevFD/DOLeqM1 q9NA5l8Iq32XTroVSRhKHHqxXsXGqHWW++Ke9ohEFF083VX2Tl5aVCL47h5uxTTOzIJD WAkxl7GBdvLvd9GJVeLHJ812QAtpgctGDpN+zmco273DSNNq2Ua92W6i3KNVnV9zfyOW PBxA== X-Google-Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DvF6mF2it8FcNZ25KVFKstW0pjoxoFYVEnhplX7cZt0=; b=kCfSlyFsm0T7ZP9hacQc63/iVri8U8dbk82dvN+7kcW7NGAA3FE/TOh/qnjxadjXx9 Omsux/fm2UBSYiYsdqS5jDpJMRIWV6kUjqCAckxtiJ/OIRKlxxgwrqupEEHZXppGuZPR Kl9PyEspdHZQGzFky389uOGw5oM73L4wIMMEnoL/Y+hLEBez9nptBTF+FRmns2bacFdi taoAheDhPgkJl9sL/SBzZOPCM9xPSLCZ8+PBG3ajSN7A+8QjyB/Jmw1YiqkkxKqbuI2d BH0c+OeWxICtdCfOpS9RNp7IEx3esOpPrs8tMcUEebjNmwCxjWIuUbl4LMmBMhAM16RQ LncQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmeVQyexc54JN9SnzVaQGwjdxHrxYpT846JDED8JK0Ap8HqFvtjH9cIKjSNmbYIXxi4kiWq X-Received: by 10.50.103.36 with SMTP id ft4mr9134041igb.89.1446430326782; Sun, 01 Nov 2015 18:12:06 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18851 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/5636C674.4090804@rapicorp.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 38 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:12:04 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <5636C674.4090804@rapicorp.com> X-Original-References: <551EA3D7.30105@onenetbeyond.org> <5617EEA7.6030803@gmail.com> <5617F732.6060202@gambaru.de> <562246E8.7050209@gmail.com> <5622636C.2030008@gambaru.de> <5623BF70.3040907@gambaru.de> <56261E4C.8010503@gmail.com> <56267489.3040909@gambaru.de> <5634B2CD.6060409@gmail.com> <20151031143314.GG12231@l04> <5634D446.5090102@gmail.com> <5634DF8C.8090808@gambaru.de> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8532 Sat4j 2.3.5 is already used by Eclipse. The 2.3.6 release should be released before the end of November. On 15-10-31 11:34 AM, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 31.10.2015 um 15:46 schrieb Luca Vercelli: > [...] >>> Now I am wondering whether it would be ok to package 2.3.5 straight away, or >>> does Eclipse strictly depend on 2.3.4? >> Well, I'm not sure of this, but I think 2.3.5 will be fine. >> Also, w.r.t. the old package sat4j, it didn't put any link in >> /usr/share/maven-repo. (I just created these links for myself using mvn >> install). >> >> Thank you >> Luca > I would go for the latest release. I agree that adding maven artifacts > to sat4j is useful. Please upload new revisions of packages to > > http://mentors.debian.net/. > http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers > > and ask for a review on this list. Is sat4j 2.3.5 also compatible with > the current version of Eclipse? Then we can upload the package straight > to unstable, otherwise I suggest to use the experimental distribution > for now. > >>> Also: I'd be more than happy to have share sat4j maintenance. >>> >>> Best, >>> Michael > Why not maintain sat4j as part of the Java team? It's no guarantee that > the maintenance effort will automatically drop to zero but some bugs can > be fixed more efficiently. > > Cheers, > > Markus >