Path: csiph.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Markus Koschany Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: Packaging org.eclipse.jetty.alpn for Debian Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2015 18:50:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Jonathan Yu , debian-java@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Sun Nov 1 17:44:22 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.58 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -6.1 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="seaC8dlhWvQFVCP9ApNOo74qSrSheXgg8" X-Sa-Exim-Scanned: No (on richard.fcube.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18850 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/56364F65.1030002@gambaru.de Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 49 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2015 18:44:05 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <56364F65.1030002@gambaru.de> X-Original-References: <5633C695.3050701@gambaru.de> <56345891.8040805@apache.org> <5634EE74.8050507@gambaru.de> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8531 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --seaC8dlhWvQFVCP9ApNOo74qSrSheXgg8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 31.10.2015 um 19:47 schrieb Jonathan Yu: > Removing alpn support impacts performance since an additional handshake= > is necessary at the application (http) level. Is it possible to instead= > patch the source to include the needed support class? It can then be > removed when Java 9 becomes the default. I think you are right. I have removed the old patch and replaced it by ALPN.patch which is the required API copied to the right place. I feel in this case it is sensible and better than deviating from upstream. Regards, Markus --seaC8dlhWvQFVCP9ApNOo74qSrSheXgg8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWNk9lXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRBQ0YzRDA4OEVGMzJFREVGNkExQTgzNUZE OUFEMTRCOTUxM0I1MUU0AAoJENmtFLlRO1HkN2YP/2twboo0BFXggTZRCKGQ7xE1 u6ukB2h+uBH6xlh6FIDkXS8VEpqTk/x1hEIhWcS2r/fDalaX66GJoFADdL/4OEH6 EG/mVhgXEajvyJRlLpeXNh2bENHRp43ChP+BTeC8dZ+f/4vtiFrfhWkcDNspE26n 3vr/YI+pwYZPYeKVAjKhArERJipWH+nU+jV+s1Ms1dK+FAcABRXBQaaPdJUJ6FWT tLOywKlDghKSW3+h8gCSF8abCYaK0gL8thDc+Q3B77sMDjrFE1iBxtYXBYdb4weq L4CqNoAswfgTBaevYyzFOCTjSwcHBV2xf0VkIEu/64etQ+vP1XrC9VlB17qWAW52 Y3QKZYrR1LQvJwTSBgKdsL+tMgyi0gY+RV2CCyBgKL7wnHFAxWYK8hJC0vB98eja x5I8ekhxvzrmB1lqa3wJapSjJ2rWbpK17dxLSm1JJex6dHwnGVKnFAL3L8aV58C5 1KgIUkPyaMRx/NdCTs3A5GzH4cQWKKi8jSJT1yuh/24SVEihwiDMGx8lFFlqFVMO 9MnbHywK4uTrT2a/pJALRRTu7W+3kwHRqzf2OYAD5a8aP6QEz7yYII3ey6jri5Eg e3b3TgAwsxTl+y0eJ7bFm6E2K4Nw48N3ONf4KNcWiydlES1IQAmXoD1galKIiT/m +tQ3JQ0bq9r+ySZvfukw =zezA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --seaC8dlhWvQFVCP9ApNOo74qSrSheXgg8--