Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Markus Koschany Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: plans for eclipse luna in debian Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 16:40:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Luca Vercelli , Michael Tautschnig , debian-java@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Sat Oct 31 15:34:51 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -6.1 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iVbnPDRncnwqvjKHGGMnLFirSgf7c0VgC" X-Sa-Exim-Scanned: No (on richard.fcube.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18844 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/5634DF8C.8090808@gambaru.de Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 71 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 16:34:36 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <5634DF8C.8090808@gambaru.de> X-Original-References: <551EA3D7.30105@onenetbeyond.org> <5617EEA7.6030803@gmail.com> <5617F732.6060202@gambaru.de> <562246E8.7050209@gmail.com> <5622636C.2030008@gambaru.de> <5623BF70.3040907@gambaru.de> <56261E4C.8010503@gmail.com> <56267489.3040909@gambaru.de> <5634B2CD.6060409@gmail.com> <20151031143314.GG12231@l04> <5634D446.5090102@gmail.com> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8525 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --iVbnPDRncnwqvjKHGGMnLFirSgf7c0VgC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 31.10.2015 um 15:46 schrieb Luca Vercelli: [...] >> Now I am wondering whether it would be ok to package 2.3.5 straight aw= ay, or >> does Eclipse strictly depend on 2.3.4? >=20 > Well, I'm not sure of this, but I think 2.3.5 will be fine. > Also, w.r.t. the old package sat4j, it didn't put any link in > /usr/share/maven-repo. (I just created these links for myself using mvn= > install). >=20 > Thank you > Luca I would go for the latest release. I agree that adding maven artifacts to sat4j is useful. Please upload new revisions of packages to http://mentors.debian.net/. http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers and ask for a review on this list. Is sat4j 2.3.5 also compatible with the current version of Eclipse? Then we can upload the package straight to unstable, otherwise I suggest to use the experimental distribution for now. >> Also: I'd be more than happy to have share sat4j maintenance. >> >> Best, >> Michael Why not maintain sat4j as part of the Java team? It's no guarantee that the maintenance effort will automatically drop to zero but some bugs can be fixed more efficiently. Cheers, Markus --iVbnPDRncnwqvjKHGGMnLFirSgf7c0VgC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWNN+NXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRBQ0YzRDA4OEVGMzJFREVGNkExQTgzNUZE OUFEMTRCOTUxM0I1MUU0AAoJENmtFLlRO1Hk3w0P/AqVJeJmCyk1iWo22zcsjGpg +RQJIpRRHcN9iFLpmCOc81MCAjBr4X31ZBxmdjIoXyNxgpTOAP1RDHX1gzttRhDW 3xYp+cPoG0NVje+UAUOU4dZLJBPV7ucln1cFmp8tjtcDikxtNKCHsmj1lMvQMPab devat3lOuk4nXufdR8xAQGqFVzYvOLwjo678ns2AF4Y0hX5XBb2UZkN7AWEWiv0T 1Z0CJUovGsdVmLQkFZw++cVLm7eBo5kzMo5krUlKKYbtnG036EM1ZIMrqh61KAgU 8q79A/4ZIX5FwCUD/eQROOnZgv5HqV/RcV9zNpl0ytVWdfHivQdyaRg57BVHbO1k PNsayxGJVbBFK+MggGmCx++Zma32KjG6XoQ23SLAjgV/+GIYEEC626ZcJ79j9tns +jyftGlFiMaI+6WDheMPfK0tb/1kQDhRvmEtbHMxprDrkxJagGHkUgrUnwcbgvze wPCpVp+tLRfcyFvIXPoECCtrg+Ya3K8iWes3z2rbGhGxy1AhDYkeDbYNlFqvMCSD JsZTXNK22qoDcv02253M4BRZhJjWtDgZHob5ZNmFso6935Ej/VRn3J+046jERPrL 0dCU1mW9FhawJ4wWrVRbVlTu2O0Bh2jAK97FVqSN3t8SBcDtaYl8xHhoMkeuU4XS sg9Pd1NoaF73ZWAgHzpJ =GGWX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iVbnPDRncnwqvjKHGGMnLFirSgf7c0VgC--