Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Michael Tautschnig Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: plans for eclipse luna in debian Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:50:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Luca Vercelli X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Sat Oct 31 14:43:01 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5 X-Greylist: delayed 568 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at bendel; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 14:42:48 UTC Mail-Followup-To: Michael Tautschnig , Luca Vercelli , Markus Koschany , debian-java@lists.debian.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18842 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20151031143314.GG12231@l04 Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 20 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Markus Koschany , debian-java@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 14:33:14 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <20151031143314.GG12231@l04> X-Original-References: <551EA3D7.30105@onenetbeyond.org> <5617EEA7.6030803@gmail.com> <5617F732.6060202@gambaru.de> <562246E8.7050209@gmail.com> <5622636C.2030008@gambaru.de> <5623BF70.3040907@gambaru.de> <56261E4C.8010503@gmail.com> <56267489.3040909@gambaru.de> <5634B2CD.6060409@gmail.com> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8524 Hi, On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 13:23:41 +0100, Luca Vercelli wrote: > I found out that eclipse depends on sat4j 2.3.4, and we have 2.3.3. > There are some classes more in 2.3.4, so it is required. > I have built 2.3.4 from source, it's quite easy. I just had to write > some pom's myself. how can I share these? [...] It may have been worth getting in touch :-) - as sat4j maintainer in Debian I should apologise that I had failed to notice that 2.3.4 (and even 2.3.5) are out. The SVN tag names have changed, hence I hadn't been notified in any way. Now I am wondering whether it would be ok to package 2.3.5 straight away, or does Eclipse strictly depend on 2.3.4? Also: I'd be more than happy to have share sat4j maintenance. Best, Michael