Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: tony mancill Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: Patches for gluegen2 2.3.1 package Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 17:20:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Gilles Filippini , debian-java@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Sat Oct 10 15:10:45 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.98 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .debian. - helo: .dorf.mancill. - helo-domain: .mancill.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -5 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pm257kVD6oJcRFOI3B776aN7Q9OPKDRvP" X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18769 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/56192A5F.1040301@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 71 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 08:10:23 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <56192A5F.1040301@debian.org> X-Original-References: <561900FB.9070708@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8455 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --pm257kVD6oJcRFOI3B776aN7Q9OPKDRvP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/10/2015 05:13 AM, Gilles Filippini wrote: > Hi Tony, >=20 > Thank you for uploading gluegen2 2.3.1 to experimental. As you may have= > read in #779482 I'm trying to have gluegen2 usable on arch ppc64el. I'v= e > set up some patches against your last upload and the good news is that = I > achieved similar test suite results for amd64 and ppc64el. >=20 > I wonder what you prefer: I submit my patches to you or - as a Debian > java maintainer - I work directly into the package's git repository and= > upload to unstable. What do you think? Hi Gilles, That's great progress on ppc64el - thank you for working on that. If you don't mind committing directly to packaging repo, that's my preferenc= e. (A bit of an aside, but I'm happy to see the Java Team get better at team-maintaining packages. In my mind, that means that *I* need to make it a habit to follow the good examples that other developers have set - e.g. declaring myself the owner of a bug, using RFH when needed, and generally being more collaborative.) Regarding an upload to unstable, note that gluegen2 and libjogl2 are basically a matched set, and so in order to avoid generating FTBFS bugs in unstable, we need to get libjogl2 updated as well. Therefore, I suggest applying your patches and uploading 2.3.1-2 to experimental, where it is easily accessible for working on the update to libjogl2 and eventually scilab. After you apply your patches, we can also look at updating gluegen to 2.3= =2E2. Cheers, tony --pm257kVD6oJcRFOI3B776aN7Q9OPKDRvP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWGSpkAAoJECHSBYmXSz6WQbgQAK9uwlvTFpssD8SF33WFBdVj 0LPEKkI30dLlGG4/5/33CKHC+Ct6t55OxqTMnYa9esfe6ettCA2gQjxUcEqtJbYc QeYhRpilAts1EdbJwjN433oApak6wQynIysFbSSzz+CmPQf01CUtgAJMe0jBWEha UUnReDC2fRA1QjwnPTd5cmh/WA9x9DGIieDyhjVcjLAZvYU/kEGXhCQUcgk35E8B IDdfdUJYeYb7b/yOpg7gDbe5e9R+Xo11bzsGOKU6Nw4MHlfPW6kzJpCiaSYEmGoy 4EmRcDxuB4ylQWBOQVR8FuygiVdX/9VZFS9gANVnNLwVRZ6L1/0AMg4MNOmBGALr 01Ls1gvcrhYy/veoDxnlgM+dT34D5b2gwi7p0QeKq157F+6d6pcfgMQvCfBbULiL NpZZnI5O3Pio1eSe60zU3cL18Qj4/k8yZw4MYXAgDcbPPiRW0XvFlor1CeDts7pQ MoWOWrgtbYs1TFW7yi8UhqsFV802dku4QkoHsrap6dO47BJMKbhE8jxxqrpfFeQp YTLV/REovQOjlEmEqHKJuBhveZJW9uP9X1NYKwkNuFaOPFnOim8oafRA1yzbDCyF HKcUhgYoGYuH2RWcOs4ZtmsTCsd0FwdJw7rZjZupFvdmPr8ffYtA0nB2bzzmXGsQ KISq4LbKZTMZCfIc2qoB =r2ix -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pm257kVD6oJcRFOI3B776aN7Q9OPKDRvP--