Path: csiph.com!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Gilles Filippini Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Patches for gluegen2 2.3.1 package Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 14:20:01 +0200 Message-ID: X-Original-To: debian-java@lists.debian.org, tmancill@debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Sat Oct 10 12:14:16 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.68 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5 X-Originating-IP: 88.189.102.17 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AbUCRxLcPFfvGQnjaV6rnVI3NXNu8Gbil" X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18768 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/561900FB.9070708@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 39 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 14:13:47 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <561900FB.9070708@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8454 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --AbUCRxLcPFfvGQnjaV6rnVI3NXNu8Gbil Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Tony, Thank you for uploading gluegen2 2.3.1 to experimental. As you may have read in #779482 I'm trying to have gluegen2 usable on arch ppc64el. I've set up some patches against your last upload and the good news is that I achieved similar test suite results for amd64 and ppc64el. I wonder what you prefer: I submit my patches to you or - as a Debian java maintainer - I work directly into the package's git repository and upload to unstable. What do you think? Thanks, _g. --AbUCRxLcPFfvGQnjaV6rnVI3NXNu8Gbil Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWGQEGAAoJEO/obGx//s+DsmMIAKRvx/PyyTf36KuvlzGZMJNf QnFUxZ3Tx8x1QtnROMkhnL+/1YJKrhQmsQVROqOD2YKrkzA9cu1lRdAvXXAx2lJ7 nA/tOpmdJ3BzepCfnCX9srUN7kGr9495MTtTGB6HEpz5ofh1ai6o9C1Vk0twBV+i nwOOzu2VjaeQezb49ELdcuoT8WcKEd/Io9QHiFIuukKXwkfV+fPEe6cDEkkApG4M eDA/l1NMw/sF8ytHwYTNCt/fhDX7Od5VbB4jsyyIQ93W5AozU0XA/EfqaBe1rn2J kxy2wXoGDOUzbhMHyPy1L6CcwQGCWFoH7bO7+q613RBve2a3dLH7HHIswH2GIS8= =QHY9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AbUCRxLcPFfvGQnjaV6rnVI3NXNu8Gbil--