Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!news.spin.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Bas Couwenberg Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java,linux.debian.devel.mentors Subject: Re: Java problem when upgrading pixelmed Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 13:50:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Debian Med Packaging Team , Debian Java List , Debian Mentors List X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Thu Oct 8 11:48:20 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.62 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -7 X-Greylist: delayed 351 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at bendel; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 11:46:51 UTC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sender: sebastic@xs4all.nl (33+o/bdEI6RHDYpdprxXjmdbR9foAAJA) User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18753 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/1496d0a4d4f56b23f368ccba16051feb@xs4all.nl Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 21 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 13:40:58 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <1496d0a4d4f56b23f368ccba16051feb@xs4all.nl> X-Original-References: <20151006202809.GB12054@an3as.eu> <561430E8.2020003@apache.org> <20151008110351.GA8387@an3as.eu> <5616536C.6010007@apache.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8439 linux.debian.devel.mentors:34037 On 2015-10-08 13:28, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > It looks like you need the new standard Java API for JSON processing > (JSR 353) [1], we haven't packaged it yet, but josm has a local copy > (if > you search for 'package javax.json' on http://source.debian.net you can > quickly find the package containing the classes your are looking for). Please don't rely on josm for the javax.json classes. Due to the difficulties getting JCS [0] and its dependencies [1] packaged, I've not been able to update to any of the newer JOSM upstream releases making the josm package increasingly irrelevant. And if I remain unable to get JCS packaged, I'll have josm removed from the archive before the freeze. [0] https://bugs.debian.org/783538 [1] https://bugs.debian.org/792690 Kind Regards, Bas