Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!news.spin.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Markus Koschany Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: RFS: gradle_2.7-1 Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 20:00:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-java@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Mon Oct 5 17:53:25 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.2 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -6.1 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="c3uxBh8RWjXuD2vGCN7WFsMqqCiW4scNK" X-Sa-Exim-Scanned: No (on richard.fcube.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18737 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/5612B8D7.7020705@gambaru.de Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 53 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 19:52:23 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <5612B8D7.7020705@gambaru.de> X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8422 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --c3uxBh8RWjXuD2vGCN7WFsMqqCiW4scNK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 05.10.2015 um 19:41 schrieb =E6=AE=B7=E5=95=9F=E8=81=B0: > Hi Debian Java maintainers, >=20 > I recently finished up updating Gradle to 2.7 (although there will be > 2.8 soon). This update covers the ongoing transition to > libservlet3.1-java. Note that this version of Gradle will be built > using the existing gradle_2.5-3 in sid/unstable. I am looking for > someone to review and sponsor the package. Can anyone help? Thank you! I'll take care of this. Did you check the reverse-dependencies? Do we have to expect any fallout? By the way: https://bugs.debian.org/800930 This tool sounds like heaven. :) Regards, Markus --c3uxBh8RWjXuD2vGCN7WFsMqqCiW4scNK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWErkEXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRBQ0YzRDA4OEVGMzJFREVGNkExQTgzNUZE OUFEMTRCOTUxM0I1MUU0AAoJENmtFLlRO1HkTD8P/3yFwytZAFP4wOtYl9QqaWal LG4di8MDyX4N6F7aTYqBNSG6KRI6gmBzjQIxhFurIwp2Nj2jkbExaxlr6TNw22KE gcm5VLbqaAXo2phz2/iFYA7R0uIkpVGiScgL/CwaL8ztCp8TX0RYD7x6VlUVXEs3 +ugXaMjtcSvxjyO+bnqUkB42ySSm2qrp/4MLWucIAMe59r8Aea0gid7LUQD1MkqU Jpi8iImA/o8D+7gleUWFTlDO+YmTmoJ5mcPOmz4M1om1R4NqKC7oaNk+qZiZsvte APPmMCVxyShdIcyDUOZc6i2k75+r8TBVXcPwZX2e70OVUV76hmkdzYFQjmXkVM2c 9i+8Obkpkx1jbg5eilMzQ7i0lU1OEAcdHy30Pa1Q1YcPVqfpGZ6DomgR/fD0xPrx eZlfbW825upp0Tyb/ESUM1k+xdajC5D1z7P+sYr661AWnJjG9RL7dM5JuSYsGTyh Pg7tgw4zvvZCLGROfb7sOIkuzG9c/JffsmmRU16N4m1JfefE4Hwya/+q5EVAu4Bq 0R9WKsezaOmGdY2V6g5VWc87d0Tr61dpb1pIAaAjg+qACxFaxbV04ZEpVMwHlcVZ FV3F7VunasQmS4/2hHmQ0AbgDNewcdcswoyjon/knrUWTFJyrx2uXvKHNIJCUlUs K8RNVFcHFhoNgii/TZDu =rOKa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --c3uxBh8RWjXuD2vGCN7WFsMqqCiW4scNK--