Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8417

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails

Path	csiph.com!goblin3!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails
Date	Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:50:01 +0200
Message-ID	<qgbvb-4Vf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qe4et-Oh-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe4Hw-1BQ-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe50V-1Za-85@gated-at.bofh.it> <qfjl8-331-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>, reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Mon Oct 5 10:40:23 2015
Old-Return-Path	<emmanuel.bourg@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.5 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.198, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vqGoaY8DmdsftF8aBIKNxlBSFA8hZDBB51qRMd67Shg=; b=ubi2XWGcKT6UnpotdeZfahku1QSMlYmTToNovsBsa3l7yJRV3Tq+o25uQ9eUpHoFnD Kzo+pCUvCbfUXyI5qDQnCrsGWVd/Rg4llCid6UZ/Hjcy5c6+cvR21U1bVc6zGyXX+OMG ZxwECJOyFWrTkEVJM4ksZfjBFvjCJvLf3ql32Jie+7KG4OFzpK/ecFKmUpE0MFGtlZFT frZstBGVYUp/ZaF5r1MoFRugVG2wg2QvHdSdmnT3ujnDuj+KErnvNP2C9iwhynZojYG4 z/s0/TL6Fq9LE/ihPLwnjwNlQhnylIL542p06yOzCcWg/jKCXbtyOICpLWQji/cwpgyt aOdQ==
X-Received	by 10.194.123.193 with SMTP id mc1mr27383624wjb.154.1444041608002; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 03:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status	N1110
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Mailing-List	<debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18731
List-ID	<debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/56125386.8020100@apache.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	19
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc	"debian-java@lists.debian.org" <debian-java@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date	Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:40:06 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<56125386.8020100@apache.org>
X-Original-References	<20150928230515.CADF11ED52@jenkins.debian.net> <201509291708.21156.holger@layer-acht.org> <560AAC37.8080104@apache.org> <201510030256.26807.holger@layer-acht.org>
X-Original-Sender	Emmanuel Bourg <emmanuel.bourg@gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8417

Show key headers only | View raw

Le 03/10/2015 02:56, Holger Levsen a écrit :

> I've limited notifications to unstable and experimental now, and also improved 
> the code a bit that only one mail per is sent per source package in all 
> suites, no matter how many status changes it had. But we should still improve 
> it to allow individual subscriptions, and probably this is best done via 
> tracker.d.o - does anybody know how to achieve that?

Hi Holger,

Thank you very much for the changes. Let's see how it goes, but I
suspect the volume of notifications will be much better and the need for
individual subscriptions less critical.

Is it possible to increase the threshold to 2 notifications per package
per day? Sometimes we fix build issues the same day they are reported,
and getting the fix notification would be useful.

Emmanuel Bourg

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-29 16:40 +0200
  Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-29 16:50 +0200
    Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-29 17:10 +0200
      Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-29 17:30 +0200
        Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-10-03 03:00 +0200
          Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-10-05 12:50 +0200
            Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-10-05 13:10 +0200
    Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-29 17:50 +0200
      Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-30 12:40 +0200
        Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-30 13:10 +0200
          Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-30 14:30 +0200
            Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 16:10 +0200
              Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@mapreri.org> - 2015-09-30 16:20 +0200
                Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-30 16:30 +0200
  Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-29 17:20 +0200

csiph-web