Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Hans-Christoph Steiner Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: groovy should not release with stretch Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 12:20:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-java@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Fri Oct 2 10:12:24 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.22 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: DYN_NJABL=SKIP(0) NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 BL_NJABL=SKIP(-1.5) CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .at. - helo: .out2-smtp.messagingengine. - helo-domain: .messagingengine.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -7 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=tB/jOVr7JkJuH4H qiyGIkhFOur0=; b=M7kxJkefyxB1GATkqvRzlRdjvG+s0XzN7fhDQmTTe79YaIT lDVONQgpVoCDDznFGVtsM2YyHMGQ+CRwQ3HSPE0f6x6qX/t3V9EX6jAcppQDu97G rOL3Gu8FmSok3auX7md/j3TiJ2pu9Cw2RV6HRaTsAWhgqcSpuUIdewYizrwc= X-Sasl-Enc: nl82ENFTUpx5XXiqxsgbNw1SERkytkEQFztlQ5lWgFn9 1443780726 Openpgp: url=http://pgp.surfnet.nl:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9F0FE587374BBE81 X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Organization: @||@ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18726 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/560E5874.6090307@at.or.at Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 33 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 12:12:04 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <560E5874.6090307@at.or.at> X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8412 殷啟聰: > On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 22:38:40 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >> Package: groovy >> Severity: serious >> >> A separate source package groovy2 was uploaded, so reverse dependencies >> need to be migrated to that one and groovy removed. >> >> Cheers, >> Moritz >> >> > > Hi Moritz and all pkg-java members, > > I am wondering if it is better to upgrade groovy to the latest version > (2.4.5 as of now) and drop groovy2, and migrate all build-rdeps of old > Groovy 1.x to using a separate groovy-1.8 or groovy-1.9 package if > necessary. In the end that we get rid of groovy and remain a groovy2 > package seems odd. Anyway BND, Maven are under the similar transition. > Since GSoC I have been maintaining Gradle in Debian so I am happy and > willing to do the transition. > > Cheers, > Kai-Chung Yan I agree with Kai-Chung's plan, if we can manage to get it done in time. Even better would be to updated all packages to work with groovy 2.4.x, then just make a single groovy package based on groovy 2.4.x . .hc