Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8362
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common |
| Date | Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:00:02 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qbxd0-8t1-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qbtCp-3y2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qbx3j-8hS-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-java@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Tue Sep 22 14:59:56 2015 |
| Old-Return-Path | <emmanuel.bourg@gmail.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-7.5 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.198, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -7 |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vE15eWHqqn8Ab/Zn4SenroyQ16a7r5Xj2nGJMPrH6HA=; b=oPsq63bgrfufbRG2wREwlulqJhCLbgIJQMNZnVGjSzc7sC7eLaksNiy9pKXvmSi4w2 1ESFt+xjqgIyLka8rWXjysoKRf/+/R4eYzYm/HxHEZO01y831jnSh2tun3ZSCDC0dk1A tk55gqgGp/3OAOwLx/098IpCRKqvX8k2lNlwBD5nmlblrlPBomgYTOMGpw3WUSPfJ31+ xaOyFMb+ADsq1Ajr0iCsB0vuiGCiY3esERWARp/tHnUdNAXnVgYi6Lu5BmQhIrHSKzFO 8zOd59lpUITF4GKmajS+9ROXRFiGaFw///lxYYbYPKH8BPp5r2s/DzI9Zj3z1J9OExtR D36A== |
| X-Received | by 10.194.93.229 with SMTP id cx5mr29183593wjb.62.1442933964892; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 07:59:24 -0700 (PDT) |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Enigmail-Draft-Status | N1110 |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18676 |
| List-ID | <debian-java.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/56016CCB.8090108@apache.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 15 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Date | Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:59:23 +0200 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <56016CCB.8090108@apache.org> |
| X-Original-References | <56013554.6020608@apache.org> <5601694C.3010709@gambaru.de> |
| X-Original-Sender | Emmanuel Bourg <emmanuel.bourg@gmail.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8362 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Le 22/09/2015 16:44, Markus Koschany a écrit : > I agree with Thorsten that this would imply a packaging overhead for > only a little gain. Although I think that splitting the documentation > would be cleaner, it is probably not worth the effort for a few KB. No > strong preferences from my side though. Thank you for the feedback. I'm suggesting this change mainly for a better separation of concerns, the space saved is obviously insignificant. For example a separated policy makes it possible to upload an updated default-jre package in experimental and then publish policy changes in unstable without waiting for java-common to transition to unstable. Emmanuel Bourg
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Splitting the Java policy from java-common Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-22 13:10 +0200
Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Jan Henke <Jan.Henke@taujhe.de> - 2015-09-22 14:00 +0200
Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2015-09-22 14:00 +0200
Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-22 19:50 +0200
Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-22 16:50 +0200
Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-22 17:00 +0200
Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common tony <tmancill@debian.org> - 2015-09-22 17:20 +0200
Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-22 17:40 +0200
Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2015-09-22 17:40 +0200
Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-22 18:00 +0200
Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2015-09-22 18:10 +0200
Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-23 00:00 +0200
Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-23 10:00 +0200
Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-23 11:20 +0200
Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> - 2015-09-23 15:40 +0200
csiph-web