Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8361

Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common

Path	csiph.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common
Date	Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:50:01 +0200
Message-ID	<qbx3j-8hS-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qbtCp-3y2-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	debian-java@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Tue Sep 22 14:44:45 2015
Old-Return-Path	<apo@gambaru.de>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-12.7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -6.1
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hwB1qApk2mdU8UsRprQn1kHsNe2nOK1xw"
X-Sa-Exim-Scanned	No (on richard.fcube.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Mailing-List	<debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18675
List-ID	<debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/5601694C.3010709@gambaru.de
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	45
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:44:28 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<5601694C.3010709@gambaru.de>
X-Original-References	<56013554.6020608@apache.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8361

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Am 22.09.2015 um 13:02 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
[...]
> What do you think?

I agree with Thorsten that this would imply a packaging overhead for
only a little gain. Although I think that splitting the documentation
would be cleaner, it is probably not worth the effort for a few KB. No
strong preferences from my side though.

Regards,

Markus

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Splitting the Java policy from java-common Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-22 13:10 +0200
  Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Jan Henke <Jan.Henke@taujhe.de> - 2015-09-22 14:00 +0200
  Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2015-09-22 14:00 +0200
    Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-22 19:50 +0200
  Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-22 16:50 +0200
    Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-22 17:00 +0200
      Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common tony <tmancill@debian.org> - 2015-09-22 17:20 +0200
        Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-22 17:40 +0200
        Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2015-09-22 17:40 +0200
          Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-22 18:00 +0200
            Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2015-09-22 18:10 +0200
            Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-23 00:00 +0200
  Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-23 10:00 +0200
    Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-23 11:20 +0200
      Re: Splitting the Java policy from java-common Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> - 2015-09-23 15:40 +0200

csiph-web