Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: dean <deanshannon3@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java
Subject: Re: New guy with some questions
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 13:30:01 +0200
Message-ID: <q62Mx-47x-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <q5y25-2lw-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <q5J7c-1k0-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Old-Return-Path: <deanshannon3@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TLbGTmiM8e2VFsBj7eBQswtTmcRpMFO7s"
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 90
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8329

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--TLbGTmiM8e2VFsBj7eBQswtTmcRpMFO7s
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 07/09/15 00:24, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 06.09.2015 um 04:34 schrieb dean:
>=20
> Hello dean,
>=20
> welcome to Debian Java.
>

Thank you.

> Filing a wishlist bug report against bouncycastle and setting yourself
> as the owner of that bug is a good way to avoid double work and to
> inform people you are working on something. It is probably not too hard=

> to use the experimental package as a base and upgrade to 1.52. The time=

> consuming part is to check if all reverse-dependencies still build from=

> source with 1.52 and to fix all those packages which are possibly broke=
n
> with the latest version.
>=20

I will get to this shortly.

>> Secondly package libbcprov-java-doc is supposed to install the api doc=
s
>> but does not actually contain the the documentation. Should i file a b=
ug
>> for this too?
>=20
> Indeed this looks like a bug. libbcpg-java-doc does not contain any
> javadoc either.
>=20
>> Is this as simple as including the javadoc's in the git
>> repo and building the package?
>=20
> We always build the javadoc from source, so it is a matter of getting
> debian/rules right. You could try to rebuild the package and figure out=

> why the documentation is missing. I can see there are different install=

> targets which are supposed to move the documentation into the
> corresponding doc packages. Obviously two of them do not work as expect=
ed.
>


I just built libbcprov-java-doc from source with debuild and the doc's
were generated and installed. There were some doc errors but it worked.
I'll investigate further and report back.

>=20
> Thanks for your interest in packaging Java software for Debian.
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> Markus
>=20


--TLbGTmiM8e2VFsBj7eBQswtTmcRpMFO7s
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Jpj0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--TLbGTmiM8e2VFsBj7eBQswtTmcRpMFO7s--