Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Stephen Nelson Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: Azureus Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 11:50:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: tony mancill , debian-java@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Tue Aug 18 09:44:41 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, ONEWORD=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .eccostudio. - helo: .mail-lb0-f182.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -5 X-Google-Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=ZAjhZOAG16UEIPTT/1a0t10fDCBEYo0azPWEGUkiPlk=; b=k1tqBYcsJxh4le87WI9Pe4E9drLSMs/n460hQ8KsIY2oO9SZufDR3ADrneDqr/jr1e ZaiIt6SbNcuMrK/hR/6jy9ekJoxvvawGvHpeSSRbNgb0SOPioCqt61bgRrkTfpG9ZIIz biLAgXzomIZmr6WnpPSoMw4lE8C+CYCYiMlert3Pfm/BSfjYknl8Eyqxeudwk/Ia6qSL IGSB5C08+N01ph5N/AUvoAB94wWWRwj9wPzFmwC549Cg9m4LnriCyDZ+J2cRt+2eG5GI mJsefAAQByzmZH+i16TeQU2414rVeWMcAE1cYFnGqIuDEB10bBHCyjQr24NzT+iUWlBo SJZA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmJW5KQ28yw1BiuYwPNXIB9hIbBuPysItM7PU8jkVr3Vt9VWc9SNmwpMu6fcu7HP7wgZrQ6 X-Received: by 10.112.199.133 with SMTP id jk5mr5654055lbc.32.1439891042292; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 02:44:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c264be179028051d92c2f7 X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18566 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAHpHs3=x6gJfg_Z6dO-xb+_-7i4zEsZy0x28cEYKao4jSdLQ_g@mail.gmail.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 78 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 09:43:52 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <55D29949.2070908@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8255 --001a11c264be179028051d92c2f7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, 03:33 tony mancill wrote: On 08/12/2015 04:35 PM, Stephen Nelson wrote: > I've updated Azureus/Vuze to the latest version 5.6.2.0, Hi Stephen, I haven't looked at the packaging yet, but I know that represents a lot of work - awesome. I wanted to mention one feature that had to be disabled in the current (ancient) version in the archive, which is the facility that Azureus has to update itself and its component jars. I don't know what that feature looks like in the new version, but it should be disabled in the default configuration (or code, if it's not configurable). Cheers, tony Hi Tony Thanks a lot! With regards to the auto update I have retained those patches and they apply successfully. I will need to check if additional features have been added which attempt to update themselves since version 4.x. I know the fedora java team have had similar problems so I might see how they've solved it. Many thanks Stephen --001a11c264be179028051d92c2f7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, 03:33=C2=A0tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> wrote:

On 08/12/2015 04:35 PM, Stephen Nelson wrote: > I've updated Azureus/Vuze to the latest version 5.6.2.0,

Hi Stephen,

I haven't looked at the packaging yet, but I know that r= epresents a lot
of work - awesome.

I wanted to mention one feature that had to be disabled in t= he current
(ancient) version in the archive, which is the facility that Azureus has to update itself and its component jars.=C2=A0 I don't know what that f= eature
looks like in the new version, but it should be disabled in the default
configuration (or code, if it's not configurable).

Cheers,
tony


Hi Tony

Thanks a lot! With regards to the auto update I have retaine= d those patches and they apply successfully. I will need to check if additi= onal features have been added which attempt to update themselves since vers= ion 4.x.

I know the fedora java team have had similar problems so I m= ight see how they've solved it.

Many thanks

Stephen


--001a11c264be179028051d92c2f7--