Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Mathieu Malaterre Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: batik-libs ? Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:30:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Jerome Robert Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.999 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -7 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=eFqkVGcAEt6gMDCpaxC0VvIuUUTV0Z5ywFcAvBOXlHA=; b=lsDT0p5pjVCYwDKrsGuMZXjnho0VobBqKjlnRTpZ11PWeH0h2uztrtS2HdCaj4sE53 ICVxpsjzUrwLPDGELaR766cMue9tCKG8oboSBoVqVuzUJL28mVa7sBR8P+P9mUeProfW S+fwzgMvL1CroQTtSyv/TULZ+sY+aiu3OZ8Ssb+KkkyaTzofARBkc2UP/c1d5JdxscCo /gmMYfjjM4ZIWz5/dUxvaaUbD/6KP9TrQbNx7J83Wt+REuYDNmkoyGKmyRuIa7AMrY4v IKf85odLk8RGKUyFeyvSPbLv+Eea0stnA6wAbCdhxN7H3msk21YAvGjLO3C2GwURzwoV PTtA== X-Received: by 10.170.122.79 with SMTP id o76mr14414506ykb.20.1437117925260; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:25:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Google-Sender-Auth: YVzbKkSwEEjDpISj_cGc5GV3K1o Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1137be686f8436051b0d1746 X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18494 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 77 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway X-Original-Cc: Debian Java List X-Original-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:25:05 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <55A6AC1E.1090705@gmx.com> X-Original-Sender: mathieu.malaterre@gmail.com Xref: aioe.org linux.debian.maint.java:8185 --001a1137be686f8436051b0d1746 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Jerome Robert wrote: > On 15/07/2015 11:47, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > > > From my understanding batik-libs would be equivalent to loading each > > and every batik-* components. If so this means I broke something when > > updating to batik 1.8. Could someone with more batik experience > > please double check my batik package (check svn) and tell me what I > > did wrong ? > > Hello Mathieu, > > The current batik 1.8 package batik-libs.jar, batik.jar, batik-all.jar and > batik-1.8.jar are dead link. > > Here is a possible reason: > > debian/rules assume that the upstream jar name is > batik-1.8/lib/batik-libs.jar but if you look at the build.xml: > > > > > it should be batik-1.8/lib/batik-libs-1.8.jar > > Thanks much ! --001a1137be686f8436051b0d1746 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Jerome Robert <jeromerobert@gmx.co= m> wrote:
= On 15/07/2015 11:47, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> From my understanding batik-libs would be equivalent to loading each > and every batik-* components. If so this means I broke something when<= br> > updating to batik 1.8. Could someone with more batik experience
> please double check my batik package (check svn) and tell me what I > did wrong ?

Hello Mathieu,

The current batik 1.8 package batik-libs.jar, batik.jar, batik-all.jar and = batik-1.8.jar are dead link.

Here is a possible reason:

debian/rules assume that the upstream jar name is batik-1.8/lib/batik-libs.= jar but if you look at the build.xml:

=C2=A0 <target name=3D"libs-jar" depends=3D"init, compile= , prepare-build">
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 <jar jarfile=3D"${build}/lib/${project}-libs-${comple= teVersion}.jar">

it should be batik-1.8/lib/batik-libs-1.8.jar


=
Thanks much !=C2=A0
--001a1137be686f8436051b0d1746-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CA+7wUsySUkY277nPRKwG1yEbyw+vmVP=L=zr8FVNA3xECOSORw@mail.gmail.com