Path: csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Bastien Roucaries Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: Openchemlib and Java 25 Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 22:50:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Debian Java List X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Wed Feb 4 21:46:49 2026 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.578 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.069, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4467658.vfdyTQepKt"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Debian-User: rouca X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/23871 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/8388958.18pcnM708K@debian-ei Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 65 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Vladimir Petko X-Original-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 22:46:30 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <8388958.18pcnM708K@debian-ei> X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:13125 --nextPart4467658.vfdyTQepKt Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; protected-headers="v1" From: Bastien Roucaries To: Debian Java List Cc: Vladimir Petko Subject: Re: Openchemlib and Java 25 Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 22:46:01 +0100 Message-ID: <8388958.18pcnM708K@debian-ei> MIME-Version: 1.0 Le mercredi 4 f=C3=A9vrier 2026, 22:28:37 heure normale d=E2=80=99Europe ce= ntrale Vladimir Petko a =C3=A9crit : > Dear Maintainers, >=20 > The package fails to build with Java 25[1]. The issue is relatively > straightforward to resolve - upgrading to 2026.1.4 is straightforward > (import the tarball, refresh patches, and add javafx-swing and > javafx-web dependencies). >=20 > The main obstacle, however, is the licensing concern: the updated > d/copyright includes an instance of a non-free license[2], which may > not comply with Debian Free Software Guidelines. I suppose it is an upstream left over did you try to feel a bug against upstream ? rouca >=20 > Can you please advise on the best course of action regarding this package? >=20 > Best Regards, > Vladimir. >=20 > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D1108586 > [2] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/openchemlib/-/blob/master/debian/c= opyright?ref_type=3Dheads#L80 >=20 >=20 --nextPart4467658.vfdyTQepKt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEXQGHuUCiRbrXsPVqADoaLapBCF8FAmmDvhkACgkQADoaLapB CF/4wBAAqkmOmxhIvq8eoq4v0ApS/X3WaKuPd59DBiRHSUNczLr9U6wUnN/RqRul 3lxRL8BjnXhwpidTDFbz4ii/S4hnDDLMiRGVbk5hk7EN9UfciQ76K2rgvRwKeEOC SnOqxZA+OQLZ4RpovaS+iHnP9/9s70wKFJU2QgPhvImoCa5fVlTw1RnUAAsNXUd1 slkHccyJg6/6DmZSwgTzTw8uNHfHpJ9vmG2X8r9HCKx8BrD+j9fN8aEqwkQNk4ZH 0C1EIMdQFf0NJmMcaujcR5vumnNoyPALxdvVWZtNOF6piaeOkOaFxnURVfCqHykg u96NMS/Jd/VeV166cFLy7cbJ5iLs0JQIYsgCL8GqjKpaaYx9wJz/esqGqrXKPLUm 6yCCtZgXyfkJKlfESJzGfuXaex79DlcES4vmQlClzuuKTfTd/ac6SqBMbeKOUbWD qC9Z9nBbpHBRZlM45vHNfLbQbl7Xm1ct6yiPpxqz91uyRRikCNfSC0LuFPqFgW2t nEXUyeghjvyD16epUcFQtMRdRnYGH37gPK9Oz4FM2yF+woK2Hzq/qWBYRuHhTsnY h9sZlY/A6cq2bkc1W4ts5G+iAHyYVYEXBBi9atojBG8CUAUHxy2/HAuUnPBIR8G3 g/909bKPvTtbVZmrPB0Z4Cdpwio2YiXLMgGg5AYDnWAEXwnvn+s= =jPV3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4467658.vfdyTQepKt--