Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: =?UTF-8?Q?Julien_Plissonneau_Duqu=C3=A8ne?= Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: DebConf25 Java/JVM BoF report Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2025 17:20:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Martijn Verburg , Debian Java X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Mon Aug 4 15:11:47 2025 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.195 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Webmail Free/1.6.11 X-Sender: sre4ever@free.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/23776 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/941ce8a87d4ce7a1fe9b8fc1f0eb1657@free.fr Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 34 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2025 17:11:28 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <941ce8a87d4ce7a1fe9b8fc1f0eb1657@free.fr> X-Original-References: <17ae144949aa0dd2b77dfa79c63b1fff@free.fr> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:13044 Hi Martijn, Thank you for chiming in! Le 2025-08-04 00:58, Martijn Verburg a écrit : > > Our build scripts + CI/CD pipeline configs & Linux installer scripts > can be a little convoluted. If you need to chat with the Adoptium > folks, they hang out on a Slack instance (sorry!). Assuming that's a > no go then you can probably just communicate through GH Issues or some > other mechanism? I'm fine with Slack (already on those of Gradle and Kotlin), GH issues could work as well. I would probably first focus on differences in source code (applied patches) and generated binaries (installed layout, optional features, optimizations etc) and only investigate build scripts/configs/logs when searching for explanations. > Also happy to chat about Aqa-test, TCK testing and the like (we've > introduced some automation there) as well if that's helpful. Running the test suites on Debian JDKs and publishing results would definitely be interesting. I'm not sure we are running them currently (I didn't check). At this point all these are backlog items though, I'm planning to get back to these later. Cheers, -- Julien Plissonneau Duquène