Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Markus Koschany Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Bug#1107520: libhtml5parser-java: Update to a more recent version? (#1107520) Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Mon Oct 6 21:59:08 2025 Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 Reply-To: Markus Koschany , 1107520@bugs.debian.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Cc: pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org X-Debian-Pr-Message: followup 1107520 X-Debian-Pr-Package: libhtml5parser-java X-Debian-Pr-Keywords: pending X-Debian-Pr-Source: libhtml5parser-java Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=apo@gambaru.de smtp.mailfrom=apo@debian.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-1+nnH2E/+dW3p0K+/9ym" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Debian-Message: from BTS X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1929845 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 57 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2025 23:56:27 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <54cf3e7f83cf8c1d94a4c5d68818187081c21f18.camel@debian.org> X-Original-References: <6058032.DvuYhMxLoT.ref@debian> <6058032.DvuYhMxLoT@debian> <0db8c6412721f7f5e3e805ea444f409fe3c6cd13.camel@debian.org> <13631917.O9o76ZdvQC@debian> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1265048 linux.debian.maint.java:13076 --=-1+nnH2E/+dW3p0K+/9ym Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Montag, dem 06.10.2025 um 21:27 +0200 schrieb Fab Stz: > Hello Markus, >=20 > IIRC current version in debian is 1.4+r1.3. > And upstream hasn't release a version for years. > So I built an orig tar from the latest commit at the time I created it in > June. From the upstream repo on GitHub.com/validator/htmlparser iirc. > Hence the version number I set. >=20 > Thanks for your help. My idea was to trim the version number a little because upstream isn't very active these days. In such a case you can usually omit the git commit numbe= r since you don't really need that degree of information. I have packaged the latest version now from 16.09.25 which contains just three new commits sinc= e January and called it 1.4+r20250916-1. I have pushed the new version to Git= and otherwise only made some minor changes. Let me know if that's ok for you. I= can upload the package anytime. Best, Markus --=-1+nnH2E/+dW3p0K+/9ym Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEErPPQiO8y7e9qGoNf2a0UuVE7UeQFAmjkOwtfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEFD RjNEMDg4RUYzMkVERUY2QTFBODM1RkQ5QUQxNEI5NTEzQjUxRTQACgkQ2a0UuVE7 UeRjtQ/+IRKXLKHGaDo7f5l6dxXgPw/hybZxPEYqw9lfAfz+BdGHBvcHvF/N5SJJ z4HlW7KfUfwluq0Y9eBwTJwf/dUcW6yvslj9XEwznvBi3/llSV3CCo/kDyIdVPnB RLKwjfwdnXci8IBdKn9aifbMwtFGDkssbmSgnj/VD96xD/QEJEQba/bBGeV138/f Hx9PVth+oJp2SGbpOE2THaEpHYvpFk4yDP672B7npUYqL05O/+ZaQvY27pMFtOcb EFdULq32HPB2bcvxG886WYaphupzF3v4MFkTN4LQE/+z61Lqj9Z+8OY2Jk/ZJTdb rZLehRYrix8UJ8uJMOCP8xOHFl2hk+Aa36lck7/167KuhLC73VHcbN3j1rsky5DO y3j3QBUczeGEMBhJ0PuijwRaz1fKvGvNEUte15r0dUI3HgaqvG2mCBTLFG17H7MB 7xRZrfhiRsXYusu138iw0+2LwvefxcUnHjEe7nauj+BReWuo4urcZWdOf0e3CmkT xoTT5qERTt0lYGq66PlAB0dl25LX4UKU5ZtoCOwwoSOZFOuj67niqMA8pQ4iWw1L 2Z2+wTIKDWJkrQSLoaPOSPegvt+aXuo/+4dPkLonrrNvK5svkNldXpzGdSfQ2S3V Seybt/5NzZ1Yn3NfxJRldORY+j71YTCQOcVvmJ4IgQDqafPQvm4= =8Dp5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-1+nnH2E/+dW3p0K+/9ym--