Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12979

Re: Update of XMLUnit

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!news.servidellagleba.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: Update of XMLUnit
Date	Thu, 01 May 2025 23:00:01 +0200
Message-ID	<KHJaF-3BV-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<KHlUJ-hpWO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <KHm4p-hpZX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KHJaF-3BV-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <KHAAp-hz5m-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Thu May 1 20:59:40 2025
Old-Return-Path	<tmancill@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-114.992 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.483, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M2jwXsBVhueG8BCO"
Content-Disposition	inline
X-Debian-User	tmancill
X-Mailing-List	<debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23703
List-ID	<debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/aBPgp6rJxq4Mu5KY@kubus
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	96
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	debian-java@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date	Thu, 1 May 2025 20:59:19 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID	<aBPgp6rJxq4Mu5KY@kubus>
X-Original-References	<6ff28d5a-117d-4c44-94d9-8ffb550bbb61@debian.org> <CALFf3keGiq9P4Jqc+kbGAdZYyNSp6GnLGQXEbVWG+EQyWxq7yw@mail.gmail.com> <kd_J1sq74Wol-8tsm_rDh6vxpaT44zqTJ96BkEs358hsM5y06xUxudepepLKHa6y7LDTzavq_RTxFg3SbhBLIg==@protonmail.internalid> <41f5cf90-e5ab-45eb-9320-4cf3ae950551@mechtilde.de>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12979

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Mechtilde,

After reviewing the migration guide [1] and noting that XMLUnit2 has
changes licenses from BSD to Apache 2.0, I recommend creating a new
source package xmlunit2.

That will permit you to upload the new source package to unstable now
instead of experimental and/or waiting until after trixie is released.

During the forky (trixie+1) release cycle, we can set a release goal of
updating packages that still use XMLUunit 1.x to use xmlunit-legacy.
Once there are no more reverse-dependencies, we can ask for removal of
xmlunit(1).

Thank you for coordinating on the list and for packaging XMLUnit 2.x.

Cheers,
tony

[1] https://github.com/xmlunit/user-guide/wiki/Migrating-from-XMLUnit-1.x-to-2.x

On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 01:25:16PM +0200, Mechtilde wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Do you have any problems if I start directly with a version 2 of xmlunit.
> 
> It will create some more binaries
> 
> And two of them I need for the next version of JVerein using E-Invoice.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Mechtilde
> 
> Am 30.04.25 um 22:18 schrieb Vladimir Petko:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The library has a number of reverse dependencies: libjson-java,
> > apktool, xmlunit, libspring-java, maven-shade-plugin, biojava6-live,
> > fop, maven, mondrian, ez-vcard, aptly, maven-repo-helper,
> > jenkins-json, jgrapht, biojava4-live, libxml-security-java.
> > It would be prudent to check if they build/work with the new version
> > of the library. If there are no breakages, then it is safe to proceed
> > with the upgrade, otherwise, we need to check what breaks and decide
> > if it is something we want to fix or if we are better off with
> > libxmlunit2-java.
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> >   Vladimir.
> > 
> > On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 8:00 AM Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > I want to package libmustang-cli-java (Bug#1094988)
> > > 
> > > Therefore I need xmlunit-core and xmlunit-assertj.
> > > 
> > > I find the sources under https://github.com/xmlunit/xmlunit/tree/main
> > > 
> > > Should I update https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/xmlunit to version
> > > 2.10 or ...
> > > 
> > > Should I better create a new package libxmlunit2-java
> > > 
> > > Kind regards

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Update of XMLUnit Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> - 2025-04-30 22:10 +0200
  Re: Update of XMLUnit Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2025-04-30 22:20 +0200
    Re: Update of XMLUnit Mechtilde <ooo@mechtilde.de> - 2025-05-01 13:50 +0200
      Re: Update of XMLUnit tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2025-05-01 23:00 +0200

csiph-web