Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Emmanuel Bourg Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: gradle reboot Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 13:00:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-java@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Fri Nov 29 11:51:16 2024 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.584 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.588, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -5.5 Authentication-Results: apache.org; auth=none MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/23547 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/980b0299-be9d-f1b5-9f17-e2fbce231bb2@apache.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 30 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 12:49:41 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <980b0299-be9d-f1b5-9f17-e2fbce231bb2@apache.org> X-Original-References: <78a8c1b6-c034-7e27-a0fa-9558adfcdfa9@free.fr> <1f8b8ba84612d8e1025cd32ef04c229936fdd117.camel@debian.org> <38d246ff-fac0-e6fd-d602-55f3a12e9751@apache.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12840 Le 29/11/2024 à 12:40, sre4ever@free.fr a écrit : > Or maybe we can keep all of them in experimental for a while, and > duplicate only those that prove (or are suspected eventually, after > discussing that) to be problematic? I would rather keep things as > straightforward as possible with the dependencies, gradle has a lot of > dependencies but several of them only have very few reverse-dependencies > other than gradle and sometimes kotlin. I'm not a big fan of potentially long lived experimental packages as it makes updates in sid more complicated. For example let's say the package foo has the version 1.0 in sid/testing and the version 3.0 in experimental, the upstream and pristine-tar branch on salsa are updated to the 3.0 release. If I want to update the sid package to 2.0, I can't import the release without rebasing/reimporting the experimental 3.0 release on these branches. > By the way, any opinion about making that new gradle a "gradle8" package > that provides "gradle"? My feeling is that maintaining up to 3 major > versions of Gradle is probably going to be necessary, given the breaking > changes with every major release (and sometimes in between) and what's > already announced for future releases. I have no objection to upload even 10 versions of Gradle if that's part of a plan to get to the latest release and eventually drop the temporary packages. We can keep the extra releases in sid only to avoid raising concerns from the release and security teams. Emmanuel Bourg