Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Wookey Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.ports.arm,linux.debian.maint.java,linux.debian.devel.release Subject: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:00:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Thorsten Glaser X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Thu Mar 28 13:51:12 2024 Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.449 Reply-To: Wookey , 1036884@bugs.debian.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Cc: Debian Release Team X-Debian-Pr-Message: followup 1036884 X-Debian-Pr-Package: release.debian.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TG7lY2/6mW/akb80" Content-Disposition: inline Organization: Wookware User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Debian-Message: from BTS X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1830392 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 57 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Simon McVittie , 1036884@bugs.debian.org, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:46:41 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <20240328134640.GU4300@mail.wookware.org> X-Original-References: <20240327152702.GQ4300@mail.wookware.org> <20240327162149.GR4300@mail.wookware.org> <20240327215510.GE7545@mail.wookware.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1192139 linux.debian.ports.arm:13931 linux.debian.maint.java:12743 linux.debian.devel.release:123466 --TG7lY2/6mW/akb80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2024-03-27 22:30 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > >OK, got those. but that's just binaries. It was the source changes I > >was looking for (or did I misunderstand and you didn't actually make > >any of those?), >=20 > Yes, I did not make any source changes. These were the last binaries > from before the t64 transition (I downloaded the .deb files unchanged) > with just control.tar.xz/control changed to allow installation given > the relevant libraries were already rebuilt for t64. OK. I get it now. > > but actually having an openjdk binaries is very useful > >too to satisfy the self-dependency without more faff. >=20 > Yes, that was their purpose. And it worked beatifully. Thanks. armhf and armel uploaded and accepted half an hour ago (armel built by Andr= ey Rakhmatullin) I'll try doing openjdk-20 next. Wookey --=20 Principal hats: Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/ --TG7lY2/6mW/akb80 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEER4nvI8Pe/wVWh5yq+4YyUahvnkcFAmYFdLwACgkQ+4YyUahv nkdUmA//UDjnKt9k63FiSP3ayrhQ9rIDFBHDZzdiWciB42PXwpkZzvj4WSUwRIGq VpRHSGCQODkOGLhUS++Qkb58R//nV7IPhtN0VDJYL1uQkognmyYVOOxt/IfQOpK/ 7VtWuaMCLZ6QAEbIR6slyGP5Dnwh9VYfQo78CiL3ihtIHLX5smu5kDqSPwxiJs83 m5gnTQWmW8ZaZULvYe6Z30o9xi6FzbEyfXyqmRkQIhpip/oNcmyeVmJDdBQU6y+h 4jjiu5e+eJmQxhO7epOV3q6imx+k0pKyi/t1ryhlKRf9PbVBxvZg4Q94RdAz3T8W DNWX1F6pFXAm0mWdslaYJhl4gAlcNI5nixK0HjEaR7E7uXDALZ8UcMCcsDn+VzEs 5/l7hLOziIUAVUl2bShi5WHj68AcHpxfhKAO9s5tF6mQCzmEbpc9WfpLekadyvoQ mZfwxueYmEon2gIie+WTOEab18/2NgjMmsF99sUUt0uTkRtGNjkim+j3OB4XPfTH cD0C6CuOZJ68s71UDiwtNwcAmsHbuVBUlX74PXbG616va+z7Qk8rSj1EuYDLl/Mc nJtYckKDo7ic5EDD2jS9sOgziJKZmIAysL+7wEqSNo6qzqtIvFrhBq9JCn2A8Xh+ Ds+EWgbQQ9sU9tRgPEj5rscva52CY4obJVk7w5tWa4qFo1wgA90= =TtDB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TG7lY2/6mW/akb80--