Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: tony mancill Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: OpenJDK 21 Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 06:00:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Matthias Klose X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Fri Jul 12 03:59:50 2024 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.72 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.211, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DWiTMJm2XjTxL0Vu" Content-Disposition: inline X-Debian-User: tmancill X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/23480 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ZpCqIpXMMzSejm_5@kubus Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 61 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 03:59:30 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <2BbSxiWk5cbIhjh9lQcQrbh3jXmEjQNmj3PIjgBMboU7bBnXjcyM9LoASM0K3sOJm9S5PpMlPrGn-8i0pq_OrA==@protonmail.internalid> <66a4710c-f520-4452-befa-d368719bb584@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12785 --DWiTMJm2XjTxL0Vu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi Matthias, On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:58:49AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > I'd like to update java-common to OpenJDK 21, basically uploading the > package from experimental to unstable. In the past, Emmanuel was > leading these updates, but he told me privately that he doesn't have > much time in the near future doing that. The transition was finished > for Ubuntu earlier this year (thanks Vladimir), and most, if not all > patches should be in the Debian bug tracker. Yes, the patches in the BTS (almost all from Vladimir) have been very helpful. Is the intent to allow OpenJDK 21 to migrate to testing, or to get it into unstable and block the migration? > I don't want to drive this transition on my own (besides the java-common > upload), I still have to do some other transitions. I'm not in a position to offer to drive this transition end-to-end, but can provide sponsoring and routine maintenance support. I will start by resuming working through the reported issues in the BTS. > PS: I'll be at DebConf, but I doubt we'll have much attendance from the > debian-java team there. If there are suitable facilities for video conference at Debconf, we could schedule a Java BoF to discuss your plans. Afternoon in GMT+9 will the morning in Europe and late evening in the evening in the US. (Of course, we could do that before or after Debconf too.) Cheers, tony --DWiTMJm2XjTxL0Vu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE5Qr9Va3SequXFjqLIdIFiZdLPpYFAmaQqiIACgkQIdIFiZdL PpaYPA/+PQsCFkNlgLFHnxEUFpNRsAzDVNyKhmTz8WMOEJHi8C/8AFTsVUVRERGP ELD0MweWUNZv2GcLWNMRZLa92K9+BwWnMGw4F9D/9+elf7l2gzbwh9tVPKM/loXZ /GtvzWgxvP6MbNvlnMtzFXK0fZNDIEbLOG0lj2CHJTO25kRzTi9JMMsbPVaq+5nF CO6zdPPfJXXrcESMcXQ5oGOq/FyR8wzPu/A1T0sdmE/IVFa791icYAIyrBRMTCVu EBZtGaP0p2xo9oVush1x0BkUYHQyYVJUAqidfr83BnQIKMRTyBJe48y1LNtGN0Uy nxP92tKjHnyILSAthAj5efMCZ6HoXa1I5LdLETZhYhbHXQYHjmboQcxbXXc24/ya WWM7IfmHw8aQ3vq4GUduNDMCqxTbDyMojmDxXZFFzuyFHx0rWFoj0/gfZZtDG3hp kucjCI5pnWqbtMxOl1N1b9hdtdG37v28GaTpCsNYl6+7lHePuvcT8xf2YBd0QnrW QZ5zsxOdeH0f165FSKVpzaRtYp6Ai32rZE06F17EmvDb2wzpc1D9m97kd+H/kJIo uDxQ54Tf0iB+A9hm1/tDGfBklBtGV5YCvY7d/OgrnhgkrwgNPB43fpvFLKxXRe9u o4C+wcSYlDdKxDRjMP1uRnVBAgRVdDbSiw/CwY6QJtqNps87aI4= =HOYH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DWiTMJm2XjTxL0Vu--