Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Thorsten Glaser Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 23:20:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Vladimir Petko X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Wed Mar 15 22:12:11 2023 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5.5 X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVJ43tyPycp73I8oAk9Bt0YUQyF5aEvTsBJMcbfAhv6S+deBYen enWbtSuiq673TwbLYbGc2/AyhQ== X-Google-SMTP-Source: AK7set+TIFoTuAyTjCDFDWEksNoowzNZQXysG/zIwIZE2iEa/nqEM13Bh+1Vja4NxlDJsq4z1i6Wag== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d051:0:b0:4af:69b8:52af with SMTP id n17-20020aa7d051000000b004af69b852afmr4204401edo.24.1678918308931; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 15:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: de-DE-1901 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/23271 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/503e7658-166d-66-e81-9217f2d63c7b@tarent.de Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 46 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 23:11:47 +0100 (CET) X-Original-Message-ID: <503e7658-166d-66-e81-9217f2d63c7b@tarent.de> X-Original-References: <8650b221ef3d4d62101d8ca020b83271@apache.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12615 On Thu, 16 Mar 2023, Vladimir Petko wrote: >Regarding using jtreg6 for tests of openjdk-8 it should be noted that >some tier1[1] tests fail with jtreg6. Lots of tests fail there anyway, also due to lack of asmtools. >For instance jtreg 6 fails: [=E2=80=A6] >and with jreg 5 those tests pass: [=E2=80=A6] >There are more instances like this and if it is of interest I can >provide a full comparison. Might be useful to pass that on to the 8u developers. I won=E2=80=99t be doing anything with it and the ELTS people are mostly interested in comparing test results against the previous upload=E2=80=99s, to see that nothing broke too badly. If upstream makes their tests jtreg6 compatible all the better. >Would it be possible to consider keeping jtreg 5 version around in No, we=E2=80=99re targetting jessie and stretch with openjdk-8 mostly, which lacks jtreg 5 and where the backported jtreg6 really helps, without, we had to disable the tests entirely. bye, //mirabilos --=20 Infrastrukturexperte =E2=80=A2 tarent solutions GmbH Am Dickobskreuz 10, D-53121 Bonn =E2=80=A2 http://www.tarent.de/ Telephon +49 228 54881-393 =E2=80=A2 Fax: +49 228 54881-235 HRB AG Bonn 5168 =E2=80=A2 USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Ale= xander Steeg ***************************************************= * /=E2=81=80\ The UTF-8 Ribbon =E2=95=B2=C2=A0=E2=95=B1 Campaign against Mit dem tarent-Newsletter ni= chts mehr verpassen: =C2=A0=E2=95=B3=C2=A0 HTML eMail! Also, https://www.tarent.de/newslette= r =E2=95=B1=C2=A0=E2=95=B2 header encryption! ***************************************************= *