Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Thorsten Glaser Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2023 01:40:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Thu Mar 2 00:31:21 2023 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .tarent. - helo: .mail-ed1-x52b.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5 X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVM+cbR1tDeNlJZZ0evoS+JPV+29fMXB9X46bXcBZ9GPrJupfaY v/T7t7tTsmnL/2+/s7hrddEvoQ== X-Google-SMTP-Source: AK7set8acoNzE9i8F55K8wRK/BB4X+n0JKz+CzFHOtlko5xqbVKmfCH7nzASJfKLETPVIgd8Vts71g== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:da83:0:b0:4bd:8714:cc54 with SMTP id q3-20020aa7da83000000b004bd8714cc54mr3111833eds.36.1677717059228; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 16:30:59 -0800 (PST) Content-Language: de-DE-1901 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/23254 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/c8ca74ac-6a4a-feee-315f-d27ff73b8666@tarent.de Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 37 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 01:30:57 +0100 (CET) X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12598 On Thu, 2 Mar 2023, Vladimir Petko wrote: >OpenJDK 20. We still need jtreg6 and jtreg packages for older >versions of OpenJDK. openjdk-8 was switched to jtreg6 recently. See if doko will follow for 11. >I was wondering if it would be acceptable for me >to file an intent to package proposal for JTREG7 and package it? Sure, why not (unless someone else is already working on it). Is a new package needed anyway? Can=E2=80=99t this just be an upgrade to jtreg6 (sure that will then look weird as jtreg6 version 7.1-1 but we have lots of such situations)? Is it incompatible somehow? bye, //mirabilos --=20 Infrastrukturexperte =E2=80=A2 tarent solutions GmbH Am Dickobskreuz 10, D-53121 Bonn =E2=80=A2 http://www.tarent.de/ Telephon +49 228 54881-393 =E2=80=A2 Fax: +49 228 54881-235 HRB AG Bonn 5168 =E2=80=A2 USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Ale= xander Steeg ***************************************************= * /=E2=81=80\ The UTF-8 Ribbon =E2=95=B2=C2=A0=E2=95=B1 Campaign against Mit dem tarent-Newsletter ni= chts mehr verpassen: =C2=A0=E2=95=B3=C2=A0 HTML eMail! Also, https://www.tarent.de/newslette= r =E2=95=B1=C2=A0=E2=95=B2 header encryption! ***************************************************= *