Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Olek Wojnar Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: Bazel Removal from Debian Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 16:30:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Hans-Christoph Steiner , Debian Bazel Discussion List , Debian Java Discussion List X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Tue Feb 21 15:21:12 2023 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.51 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DIGITS_LETTERS=1, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MD5_SHA1_SUM=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Debian-User: olek X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/23224 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/C653750E-C841-4F6A-AA4B-7140AD2E08F1@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 25 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Debian Bazel Packaging Team X-Original-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 15:03:52 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <2FA11FED-1D3B-49A9-BA6E-F77AB13E0C62@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12571 Hi hc, Thanks for helping to start the conversation!=20 On February 21, 2023 2:38:14 PM UTC, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >If the test passes regularly, and just sometimes fails under the same con= ditions, I would consider disabling it in autopkgtest rather than have it n= ot make it into bookworm=2E The perfect is the enemy of the good=2E Unfortunately, the test fails pretty regularly now=2E This behavior starte= d when we moved to OpenJDK17=2E That makes sense since 'UseParallelOldGC' w= as valid prior to that=2E I *have* temporarily disabled the Java tests [1]=2E As you said, to not ho= ld back the package due to a possibly flaky test=2E But my concern is that = this is actually an issue with how Bazel uses Java rather than a flaky test= =2E Again, I'd be happy to be wrong about that=2E :) -Olek [1] https://salsa=2Edebian=2Eorg/bazel-team/bazel-bootstrap/-/commit/1c906= 21d7b9b5d44d01b91dabb04645a20273ca8