Path: csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.us.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: =?UTF-8?Q?Moritz_M=C3=BChlenhoff?= Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: OpenJDK for Bookworm and beyond Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2022 21:00:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Thorsten Glaser X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Tue Nov 8 19:51:48 2022 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.3 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/23113 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/Y2qzMAjaf/3BYHfJ@pisco.westfalen.local Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 15 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Emmanuel Bourg , Debian Java , Matthias Klose , "team@security.debian.org" X-Original-Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 20:51:12 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <1645122d-d47b-cc7c-c451-4aab6228dcc3@apache.org> <3ca6758-3117-1a3d-c92d-7041ac8594f6@tarent.de> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12472 Am Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 02:06:06PM +0200 schrieb Thorsten Glaser: > > Last point, we still have OpenJDK 8 in unstable to help with the bootstrapping > > of some packages that can't build directly with the latest JDK (more > > specifically, Kotlin and Scala). Similarly I think we should preserve OpenJDK > > 11 in unstable after the transition to OpenJDK 17. > > Who’s going to maintain that? > > For OpenJDK 8 I took over because, Do we even have to keep 8 around in unstable at this point? If people want to bootstrap kotlin or scala for a new arch, why can't this happen on a buster system? Cheers, Moritz