Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12463

Status of antlr4 in Debian

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Pierre Gruet <pgt@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Status of antlr4 in Debian
Date Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:50:01 +0200
Message-ID <FkPTb-gRY4-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Wed Oct 26 14:47:33 2022
Old-Return-Path <pgt@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-10 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MEDS2=2, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -3.5
MIME-Version 1.0
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.2
Content-Language fr-FR
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------9S8zCTdwkas9ASpDJvihj10l"
X-Mailing-List <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23103
List-ID <debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/c9ca287f-0d44-325f-9fc7-d95db2fc0aad@debian.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 57
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:47:00 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <c9ca287f-0d44-325f-9fc7-d95db2fc0aad@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12463

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Emmanuel,

I am writing to you (but also to the whole team) as you are the uploader 
of antlr4.

The latest upstream version of a package I am maintaining in Debian-med 
team now fires

java.io.InvalidClassException: org.antlr.v4.runtime.atn.ATN; Could not 
deserialize ATN with version 4 (expected 3)

when I run its testsuite. I understand this is due to SERIALIZED_VERSION 
in the ATNDeserializer class of antlr4 [0] being 3 although the upstream 
of my package generated a source file with a more recent antlr4 having 
SERIALIZED_VERSION being 4.

My question is: apart from time to work on the package, is there any 
reason we should remain with antlr4 4.7.2 in Debian although 4.11.1 has 
been released upstream?


Thanks for your insights,

Cheers,

-- 
Pierre


[0] 
https://sources.debian.org/src/antlr4/4.7.2-5/runtime/Java/src/org/antlr/v4/runtime/atn/ATNDeserializer.java/

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

Status of antlr4 in Debian Pierre Gruet <pgt@debian.org> - 2022-10-26 16:50 +0200
  Re: Status of antlr4 in Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2022-10-26 18:30 +0200
    Re: Status of antlr4 in Debian Pierre Gruet <pgt@debian.org> - 2022-10-26 22:50 +0200
      Re: Status of antlr4 in Debian Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-10-26 23:00 +0200
        Re: Status of antlr4 in Debian Pierre Gruet <pgt@debian.org> - 2022-10-27 18:00 +0200

csiph-web