Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java
Subject: Re: Tomcat 10
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 08:50:01 +0100
Message-ID: <FBLJv-a6Zf-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <FBEf0-a1Yh-53@gated-at.bofh.it>
Old-Return-Path: <ebourg@apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.1
Content-Language: fr, en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 35
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12489

Hi Markus,

Thank you for taking care of the upgrade. I have no objection to push 
the packaging changes to the next Debian release. Bug 965006 happened 
because I forgot to update the Maven rules, if the 9->10 substitution is 
done well the tomcat10 package will be co-installable with tomcat9.

I would just suggest dropping the current tomcat10 repository on Salsa 
and starting with a fresh clone of the latest tomcat9 repository, from 
the 9.0.70 release (and with the full history preserved).

Let me know if you need any help.

Emmanuel Bourg


Le 12/12/2022 à 00:40, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> Hi all,
> 
> I would like to upload tomcat10 to unstable and discontinue tomcat9 for the
> upcoming next stable release.
> 
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tomcat10
> 
> I don't intend to introduce any of the changes we have previously discussed on
> this list for now and just move on with the usual modifications. Looking at
> 
> https://bugs.debian.org/965006
> 
> Do we really want to achieve co-installability or could be a Breaks+Replaces
> relationship sufficient?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Markus