Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java
Subject: Re: openjdk-8_8u292-b10-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 01:00:02 +0200
Message-ID: <Ctk0G-3zQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <CtjHj-3ty-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org  Wed Jun 23 22:57:45 2021
Old-Return-Path: <t.glaser@tarent.de>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.601 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -3.5
Content-Language: de-DE-1901
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailing-List: <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/22873
List-ID: <debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL: <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/423e8e6f-7488-be12-cb50-a286d3b3360@tarent.de
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 17
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 00:57:26 +0200 (CEST)
X-Original-Message-ID: <423e8e6f-7488-be12-cb50-a286d3b3360@tarent.de>
X-Original-References: <E1lwBCU-000A86-WB@fasolo.debian.org>
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12244

On Wed, 23 Jun 2021, Debian FTP Masters wrote:

>  openjdk-8 (8u292-b10-3) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>    * Re-upload with actually regenerated debian/control, oops

Meh. This SHOULD have failed when building the source package.

I fully blame git, unlike proper version control software (that
is, CVS), failing to get mtimes right. (I know it is so for a
fact, I blame -2 having the wrong debian/control on it.)

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
[16:04:33] bkix: "veni vidi violini"
[16:04:45] bkix: "ich kam, sah und vergeigte"...