Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: tony mancill Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Bug#929530: libsis-base-java: unaligned access on armhf Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 02:30:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Sat Dec 5 01:27:10 2020 Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4 Reply-To: tony mancill , 929530@bugs.debian.org Original-Sender: tony mancill Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Cc: Debian Med Packaging Team X-Debian-Pr-Message: followup 929530 X-Debian-Pr-Package: src:libsis-base-java X-Debian-Pr-Keywords: help X-Debian-Pr-Source: libsis-base-java X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 18; hammy, 150; neutral, 286; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--armhf, 0.000-+--H*r:TLS1_3, 0.000-+--H*F:U*tmancill, 0.000-+--aarch64, 0.000-+--16PM Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=OD9vAmROscVTs1bZLZmY/qh27XGG27U/Ik4eiPu8u/A=; b=q4sAXEDxTw6YAES6DOXeQALRyhWWwTAP0sCRAPMlnd4JgpWT38lVE3H1d5JZgD9H20 BdApiBFF1mx3+ORxV0QVPd7YX0VIQVH5TWJ3IlcNsOvP1ovQrwu1emoRn2K/R9NRnq/7 diauAxe2I1Y/YT4/QkGYFUNl4NUN14xLA0Zj3HR5vvAdcXZlZEcguTuM4NKsO7HgTjTD B9icdhk7pKgdeJkxPtEoc0bNEmTCsVlBRG+yM5RoINNq8lOS/JdchYYYkvLpCWY6NQ+5 tHheYufKMxFLFoGK1154Jy0eTT8J8J3NXtxbXzhwCYviw92ZVDhpRow0b4xJvsGw3OqC /jEQ== X-Google-Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=OD9vAmROscVTs1bZLZmY/qh27XGG27U/Ik4eiPu8u/A=; b=c5Y+zPD7W2an5ii809T/2DCOe3z93FrL9SrJ2yxVIMow1WNwhPl7Qlw4fD2RiwDzrW ceVBF2ZDMj4Fgn/KYOhi3xQXW2bSTvtvvlME9b4UChUMctqrmxadV5gDx4bRv9j2Iuy2 Gdp81SU+3WAeqLNV3AGqommHJXpFA49oWZL8G86OHa7hjS3Ayi/0kzvSXCYgFE7nnx5I o5GdBUUt+blEjQNbk7mEUoJs4pyqMgyVeQvqXUPtC/e8MBQGxqu142FTCWdIlDjpYtVA Yg+dsJfrI/eo6Mkj0Du5YRkVCjq9+OoYBqQH9/aXOohfiM0e8wxUTme5D4UPhdHAybxd Fcag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532130Vi+3w9ghqOTINGHsEqC+ENdx2JA/V2NyMfOvx+fodhaPma iqjx2LynQLLsMZL55L0l3N0= X-Google-SMTP-Source: ABdhPJxJIA+v46P7Lb57L33UzSFe/dHMQcZ6UiAUxnkTTQTwgxo3hw9BuJRrzH9OFaZ7a5OaonNfiA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ba83:: with SMTP id t3mr6636736pjr.213.1607131357569; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 17:22:37 -0800 (PST) Sender: robomod@news.nic.it MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Debian-Message: from BTS X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1636408 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 66 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway X-Original-Cc: Debian Java List X-Original-Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 17:22:35 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <20190525192402.GC17040@virgil.dodds.net> <20201202195916.GA31595@an3as.eu> <20190525192402.GC17040@virgil.dodds.net> <20201202195916.GA31595@an3as.eu> X-Original-Sender: tony mancill Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1035808 linux.debian.maint.java:11947 On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 08:59:16PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Control: tags -1 help > > I wonder whether some Java expert might be able to clarify the > situation in bug #929530. Hi Andreas, There is good news and bad news... :) The good news is that the unaligned access error is no longer an issue on armhf. I am able to compile without JVM crashing on the amdahl porter box: Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (v11.0.9.1+1-post-Debian-1) CPU Architecture: aarch64 OS: Linux (v4.19.0-12-arm64) I've run the build at least 6 times by now and not observed any issues with the JVM. The bad news is that tests are consistently failing. Specifically, the code [1] that runs after this test [2] fails consistently while trying to clean up after the test with the error below: [1] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/libsis-base-java/-/blob/master/source/java/ch/systemsx/cisd/base/tests/AbstractFileSystemTestCase.java#L139 [2] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/libsis-base-java/-/blob/master/sourceTest/java/ch/systemsx/cisd/base/unix/UnixTests.java#L121 Running testTouchSymLinkAndFileRealtimeTimer Could not delete the directory targets/unit-test-wd/ch.systemsx.cisd.base.unix.UnixTests because: 1 exceptions: [java.io.IOException: Unable to delete file: targets/unit-test-wd/ch.systemsx.cisd.base.unix.UnixTests/someLink] Could not delete the directory targets/unit-test-wd/ch.systemsx.cisd.base.unix.UnixTests in second try because: 1 exceptions: [java.io.IOException: Unable to delete file: targets/unit-test-wd/ch.systemsx.cisd.base.unix.UnixTests/someLink] Exception in thread "main" org.apache.commons.io.IOExceptionList: 1 exceptions: [java.io.IOException: Unable to delete file: targets/unit-test-wd/ch.systemsx.cisd.base.unix.UnixTests/someLink] at org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils.cleanDirectory(FileUtils.java:345) at org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils.deleteDirectory(FileUtils.java:1206) at ch.systemsx.cisd.base.tests.AbstractFileSystemTestCase.afterClass(AbstractFileSystemTestCase.java:139) at ch.systemsx.cisd.base.unix.UnixTests.main(UnixTests.java:495) at ch.systemsx.cisd.base.AllTests.main(AllTests.java:56) Caused by: java.io.IOException: Unable to delete file: targets/unit-test-wd/ch.systemsx.cisd.base.unix.UnixTests/someLink at org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils.forceDelete(FileUtils.java:1425) at org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils.cleanDirectory(FileUtils.java:338) ... 4 more Caused by: java.nio.file.NoSuchFileException: targets/unit-test-wd/ch.systemsx.cisd.base.unix.UnixTests/someLink at java.base/sun.nio.fs.UnixException.translateToIOException(UnixException.java:92) at java.base/sun.nio.fs.UnixException.rethrowAsIOException(UnixException.java:111) at java.base/sun.nio.fs.UnixException.rethrowAsIOException(UnixException.java:116) at java.base/sun.nio.fs.UnixFileAttributeViews$Basic.readAttributes(UnixFileAttributeViews.java:55) at java.base/sun.nio.fs.UnixFileSystemProvider.readAttributes(UnixFileSystemProvider.java:149) at java.base/sun.nio.fs.LinuxFileSystemProvider.readAttributes(LinuxFileSystemProvider.java:99) at java.base/java.nio.file.Files.readAttributes(Files.java:1763) at java.base/java.nio.file.Files.size(Files.java:2380) at org.apache.commons.io.file.PathUtils.deleteFile(PathUtils.java:361) at org.apache.commons.io.file.PathUtils.delete(PathUtils.java:304) at org.apache.commons.io.file.PathUtils.delete(PathUtils.java:280) at org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils.forceDelete(FileUtils.java:1423) ... 5 more However the symlink *is* present after the build (I have to remove it from the build tree manually), so I don't know yet whether this is an issue with the code on this architecture or something about how I'm using the schroot on the porterbox. In any event, my inclination is to close the unaligned access bug and open a new bug for the test failure on this architecture. I can't reproduce it on amd64. Cheers, tony