Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Markus Koschany Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java,linux.debian.bugs.dist Subject: Build failures on arm64 are release critical now Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 23:10:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: lucas@debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Sat Dec 5 22:09:21 2020 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.363 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, SARE_MSGID_LONG40=0.637] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cfrgqXeUcHIM8XpcJGtg" MIME-Version: 1.0 Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=apo@gambaru.de smtp.mailfrom=apo@debian.org X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/22584 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/549ceea6ef52e1c18b7eff8da13e349481adacc0.camel@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 50 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: 976545@bugs.debian.org X-Original-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 23:09:06 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <549ceea6ef52e1c18b7eff8da13e349481adacc0.camel@debian.org> X-Original-References: <20201205132930.GA31798@xanadu.blop.info> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:11960 linux.debian.bugs.dist:1036013 --=-cfrgqXeUcHIM8XpcJGtg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Control: severity -1 normal Hello, The package builds fine on amd64. I don't think it is correct to use severi= ty serious in this case because ufoai-maps is an arch:all package. The same is true for Java packages. If we want to make this a release goal (making arch= all packages buildable on all supported architectures), it should have been discussed months before the freeze. I saw that you have lowered the severit= y on some packages already. Can we agree to use severity normal for build failur= es on other architectures than amd64 if the package in question is arch:all? Regards, Markus --=-cfrgqXeUcHIM8XpcJGtg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEErPPQiO8y7e9qGoNf2a0UuVE7UeQFAl/MBQJfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEFD RjNEMDg4RUYzMkVERUY2QTFBODM1RkQ5QUQxNEI5NTEzQjUxRTQACgkQ2a0UuVE7 UeSRDQ/9GIw3xsclubDK/xr/GE75snf7x48b1Vww3SAM3qDqOqIvOk05gEu+w1Iz LlklD0wbq4D7E5g6fZbHSoA68hjlxqiTsIeKhJ+cizL8hstSverB9+BpS9Jgts7M 3iz7hUyUKUCmIIrYQdtsc23PJgETmn3si5eHimYK0pOTMJyHiFhNOw1RdJwZMZG3 b5L8pnZK862A/RSM6ZUqUXI6NDjl6nZiz1OpCkD8wqwZTzArE7vpJDqGdgZhCQi8 IrFN9U/yYtxOW5FFohZlvSu02yyyRVR5gr3UtqYqMKChkEyUl7nKU9L6L2+Bg2Bt kD/1PeKkT7QA1pIaqP7RVimDJ0QgStM1VU6JKXi7AsgoWHZ4zZ0TNY6eNsgvYppF /Z4fs7pmykB0vBwFo1Ivd4OKZhgWeeWiKUIKkg0pD4y/FScHkpw8qXTvtBeHAt45 1GCuNta4TpxNyRF8JzT7uN1BOkCUWg29QEtzF13u9WsvEmXYwre275gW6mgkE1m3 YPI/YXY4DItSwUX5fP0lO/itrvP7pzqPJ/KD0Hqk38sAeqfW0eUPcLHE50UIg7y5 hLCQ6gdxG1UJldpqnXMWm74fB9vXmN/6wfRahcbBpLSuEALJyxXj6+gs/1OPV+Sj za/6ZinXw5fAQ5/V19MjHJGArUS5O1JB631FOrI+gbvl+Ppxon8= =LhE9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cfrgqXeUcHIM8XpcJGtg--