Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Andreas Tille Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: Building r-cran-rcdk with cdk [Was: Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)] Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:30:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-java@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Wed Jul 29 07:23:05 2020 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/22414 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20200729072249.GQ8994@an3as.eu Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 28 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:22:49 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <20200729072249.GQ8994@an3as.eu> X-Original-References: <4b796525-403a-fe62-e77f-1ea6ffa12939@gmail.com> <20200723145510.GH12782@an3as.eu> <20200726083407.GJ8994@an3as.eu> <20200727053806.hrjj2ldtj23c7zzg@lark> <6fa84692-5c1c-45d9-e593-5ad604ba66f2@gmail.com> <20200727135044.iy4z34przcwyyxci@lark> <20200729034136.sjhl4hvsaxq42p4o@lark> <5f7daefd-d879-3ef9-d829-475fbe5f1b48@gmail.com> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:11815 Hi Tony & Andrius, On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 09:18:52AM +0300, merkys@debian.org wrote: > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/cdk/-/merge_requests/4 > > The MR looks good to me. Thanks a lot for you both working on it. > I posted a tiny suggestion to depend on > jgrapht0.6 with a version to prevent well-known FTBFS. Otherwise it's > good to go. Feel free to upload. I'd be really happy if you could upload. I'm currently swamped with other stuff (mainly at payed work) and would be happy if I simply can just test with r-cran-rcdk whether it builds or not against the uploaded package. > Thanks a lot for looking into this! +1 (again) Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de