Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Olek Wojnar Newsgroups: linux.debian.devel,linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: Progress in preparing the Bazel Build System for Debian (COVID-19 Biohackathon follow-up) Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 18:30:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org Wed May 6 16:27:30 2020 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.483 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .gmail. - helo: .mail-qv1-f65.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5 X-Google-Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=E3MpM2WFzEsbF1mBMpe42VLD7TCRXVVcCVIy2/l9ijY=; b=LdVI24ILwy4G2AtUvGgaq+a+0fLow649Yu343kc6RB9wAbuLKJlMNbo/MxwpB0YBKq aHoPkuj/A8cSKugLb+wnNSKCQA07klQcNgZikT9wrWTGIQns7XrGSoFkhFMKc7fUwshO vMZcjO7F5L/28uDAm1YElgZZUbT8V6lf2dUrDbqhFjgufi5Y1t0GFG6RrbIDE3KeHSn9 F8KDaxSbRHzyyydnDY8If9Jo06sSCQ6++jDE+952xPWg8PWbVf3/XDtK1O0sgaz25gqG F/3aC0na2fjYMQOdbR77CinI5rWhTR14vdY14BuKbA2bqJh9JmZVZ62FbCLi4KPznqjo ga5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYr37HSG+Vu9DULgQyA0cd47SGBEkQh+XihC0shbF2rAYLJgZFL G39ftClvVMRcG9sUzFdVyGsvD7bo X-Google-SMTP-Source: APiQypIxZWHByYPG2WOVfGYi/OJaqKfCHOU44PXE7XhEAUyWSdsylBIpRLE0/Je6GlYTThoZC7maKw== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:b5c4:: with SMTP id o4mr8524218qvf.229.1588781506840; Wed, 06 May 2020 09:11:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:ac8:193d:: with SMTP id t58mr8476391qtj.93.1588781505263; Wed, 06 May 2020 09:11:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003f3aa005a4fd050e" X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/343965 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAJj0crR_sPGGQjnnBL4eos=fMBmJ8x50DCa8zDZ6+pZ-ApcTOA@mail.gmail.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 56 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: "debian-med@lists.debian.org" , debian-science@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 12:12:39 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <11475b2f-a849-83ea-683c-9a506f2326c8@debian.org> <230eb635-6eb0-f9e7-7439-5bb279817d35@apache.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.devel:96509 linux.debian.maint.java:11606 --0000000000003f3aa005a4fd050e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Emmanuel, On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 10:03 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > You can remove javax-annotation from the list, it's already packaged as > libgeronimo-annotation-1.3-spec-java. Also error-prone and > checker-framework provide annotations that are not required at runtime, > patching them out is an option. > Excellent, thanks for the info! That's great news. Yes, I was considering that if we couldn't get those packaged quickly. Those two are my lowest priority for that reason. I already did something similar in a patch for libprotobuf-java and it was reasonably painless. Regarding the other generic dependencies, it would be nice to package > them under the Java Team umbrella. > I absolutely agree but I didn't want to speak for the Java Team. :) I'll pass that request on to any contributors I interact with. -Olek --0000000000003f3aa005a4fd050e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Emmanuel,

On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 10:03 = AM Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.or= g> wrote:

You can remove javax-annotation from the list, it's already packaged as=
libgeronimo-annotation-1.3-spec-java. Also error-prone and
checker-framework provide annotations that are not required at runtime,
patching them out is an option.

Excelle= nt, thanks for the info! That's great news. Yes, I was considering that= if we couldn't get those packaged quickly. Those two are my lowest pri= ority for that reason. I already did something similar in a patch for libpr= otobuf-java and it was reasonably painless.

Regarding the other generic dependen= cies, it would be nice to package
them under the Java Team umbrella.

I ab= solutely agree but I didn't want to speak for the Java Team. :) I'l= l pass that request on to any contributors I interact with.

<= /div>
-Olek
--0000000000003f3aa005a4fd050e--