Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > linux.debian.maint.boot > #72443

Re: DD application (Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer)

From Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.boot
Subject Re: DD application (Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer)
Date 2024-05-11 22:10 +0200
Message-ID <ID1cB-cGe9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <ICjbz-cf3K-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ICjlf-cf90-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ICseR-ckIX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ICsye-cl4U-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ICt1g-cleM-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Debian

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi,

Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> (2024-05-10):
> I know you repeatedly suggested this. Especially every time I ask for
> more packages to get dm permissions for :-))

Just in case that's not clear: I'm not trying to get rid of you as if
you were a burden (which you're clearly not), I'm suggesting you get
recognized as an uploading DD (which you certainly qualify for
already!).

> My problem with this: am I really capable of being a DD? You might
> remember that I am not a programmer, I have no real skills in this
> direction. I can do some scripting, gained by self-learning, but that
> does not make a programmer of me IMO ;-)

You certainly don't need to be any kind of programmer (professional or
self-taught) to be a DD.

Given a package that you'd like to upload, are you able to look around
in its source code, spot issues or things you want to improve, to come
up with a patch that you'd be confident to upload? That's what matters.
That's already happening for the packages you're DM-allowed to upload.

When facing an issue or question, do you pick a random solution, hope
for the best, upload, and watch the fireworks? Or do you ask others,
gather feedback, and come up with a solution that has high chances to
work? Definitely the latter, and that's what matters.

Being knowledgeable about packages you're uploading (be it via a
sponsor, a DM approval for this package or because you're a DD) is
important. But that doesn't mean you need to understand and know its
codebase by heart. Being reasonably sure that the changes to be uploaded
are improving the situation as a whole, minimizing risks on the rest of
the ecosystem (other packages in general, not breaking the installer in
this specific case) is really what seems to be most important to me.

You're definitely acquainted with the a bunch of things in the installer
ecosystem, you're also knowledgeable about l10n topics, and you're
definitely an excellent team player.

As far as I'm concerned, the only bug is that your key is not in the
right keyring! :)

> So I am unsure if I can successfully go the apply-for-DD path...
> I fear I lack some basic knowledge for this.
> Don't want to waste my and the application manager's time and effort
> for something, that does not lead to anything at the end.

I suppose you already went through questions/checks around the Social
Contract, Debian Free Software Guidelines, Debian Machine Usage
Policies, etc. during the non-uploading DD application, so I'm not
putting any focus on those (important nonetheless!) topics.

I'd imagine the main difference between both types of application to be
around… package manangement/uploads. And you definitely know how to
upload packages already, as evidenced by:
  https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Wansing


Please let me know if I can do anything to help you get set up as a DD.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Back to linux.debian.maint.boot | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> - 2024-02-13 23:50 +0100
  Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2024-02-14 09:40 +0100
  Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-05-09 23:20 +0200
    Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> - 2024-05-10 08:50 +0200
      Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-05-10 09:10 +0200
        DD application (Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer) Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> - 2024-05-10 09:40 +0200
          Re: DD application (Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian  installer) John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-05-10 09:40 +0200
          Re: DD application (Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian  installer) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-05-11 22:10 +0200
            Re: DD application (Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian  installer) Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2024-05-11 23:10 +0200
            Re: DD application (Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian  installer) Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> - 2024-05-13 18:30 +0200
  Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de> - 2024-05-10 11:40 +0200
  Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2024-05-11 20:30 +0200
    Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2024-05-12 01:20 +0200
  Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-05-12 09:00 +0200
    Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> - 2024-05-12 12:00 +0200

csiph-web