Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Hans de Goede Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.kernel Subject: Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:40:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Maxime Ripard Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.799 Reply-To: Hans de Goede , 793185@bugs.debian.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Cc: Debian Kernel Team X-Debian-Pr-Message: followup 793185 X-Debian-Pr-Package: src:linux X-Debian-Pr-Source: linux X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 8; hammy, 149; neutral, 83; spammy, 1. spammytokens:0.952-+--our hammytokens:0.000-+--31pm, 0.000-+--31PM, 0.000-+--H*RU:mx1.redhat.com, 0.000-+--cpufreq, 0.000-+--H*RU:209.132.183.28 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.27 X-Debian-Message: from BTS X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1193496 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 41 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Thomas Kaiser , linux-sunxi , 793185@bugs.debian.org, leonardo.canducci@gmail.com, m.silentcreek@gmail.com X-Original-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:23:33 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <55B23C55.1060404@redhat.com> X-Original-References: <736b90b4-b000-4a79-817a-5e1b5c3605f3@googlegroups.com> <46ac4df1-b633-4244-8822-45be844af143@googlegroups.com> <55B21435.5040506@redhat.com> <20150724115004.GD2564@lukather> <6c78647c-4d92-476c-a692-ee048cbce8ab@googlegroups.com> <2b493541-bf0d-4d60-a830-396b70a7ce95@googlegroups.com> <55B23677.2080709@redhat.com> <20150724131607.GI2564@lukather> Xref: aioe.org linux.debian.bugs.dist:666841 linux.debian.kernel:50275 Hi, On 24-07-15 15:16, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:58:31PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> There is slightly more to it then those 5 lines, but yes we should enable >> voltage scaling on more boards. This mostly requires someone to simply >> just do the work. >> >> I've a workshop on dts this weekend at our localhacker space and the plan >> is for the people attending to get some handson experience by them doing >> this work (amongst other things) :) > > While I agree with you on the fact that more board needs to have the > regulators enabled, I really don't think that making some newbies > doing it without any schematics (and boards I guess?) They will only be writing patches for boards which I have, and the patches will be tested on the actual boards before submitting them upstream. I will be collecting and double checking all patches before sending them to you. I will let you know if they blow up any boards :) But I do not really expect that to happen. > is a good thing > when it comes to something that can permanently damage a board. > > I'd expect that such changes would be carefully done and tested before > being submitted. And they will be, see above. Regards, Hans -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org