Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available

Path	csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject	Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available
Date	Wed, 04 Mar 2026 11:40:01 +0100
Message-ID	<MuRO1-4Wm3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<MrQbL-2Sdk-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <MrJWG-2NTx-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Mt2Xf-3G6Q-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MrJWG-2NTx-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Mt2Xf-3G6Q-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>, 1128861@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Wed Mar 4 10:31:07 2026
Old-Return-Path	<debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
X-Spam-Flag	NO
X-Spam-Score	-1.699
Reply-To	Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>, 1128861@bugs.debian.org
Resent-To	debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Cc	debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
X-Debian-Pr-Message	followup 1128861
X-Debian-Pr-Package	src:linux
X-Debian-Pr-Keywords	upstream
X-Debian-Pr-Source	linux
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition	inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Debian-User	carnil
X-Debian-Message	from BTS
X-Mailing-List	<debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1956369
List-ID	<debian-bugs-dist.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist/>
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	25
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
X-Original-Date	Wed, 4 Mar 2026 11:28:34 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<aagJUlFIJkjgbEHQ@eldamar.lan>
X-Original-References	<c0f15088-3fc0-487a-9f24-cf89c158420d@proton.me> <177187492815.425331.14320091315652332093.reportbug@nimble> <418f30b5-06ae-471f-bf5f-f14f3f75deff@leemhuis.info> <177187492815.425331.14320091315652332093.reportbug@nimble> <418f30b5-06ae-471f-bf5f-f14f3f75deff@leemhuis.info>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1284563 linux.debian.kernel:91519

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Control: found -1 6.19.5-1~exp1
Hi,

On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 10:54:13AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> [CCing a few people and lists]
> 
> On 2/24/26 03:09, Tj wrote:
> > Upstream commit 4cc9b9f2bf4dfe13fe573 "nfsd: refine and rename 
> > NFSD_MAY_LOCK" and
> >   stable v6.12.54 commit 18744bc56b0ec
> 
> In case anyone just like me is wondering: the latter is a backport of
> the former.
> 
> >  (re)moves checks from  fs/nfsd/vfs.c::nfsd_permission().>   This causes NFS clients to see
> > 
> > $ flock -e -w 4 /srv/NAS/test/debian-13.3.0-amd64-netinst.iso sleep 1
> > flock: /srv/NAS/test/debian-13.3.0-amd64-netinst.iso: No locks available
> 
> Does this happen on mainline (e.g. 7.0-rc1) as well?

Not tested 7.0-rc2, but the issue is reproducible still in 6.19.5.

Regards,
Salvatore

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Bug#1128861: linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available" Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-23 20:40 +0100
  Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available") Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-23 23:30 +0100
  Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available") Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-24 00:40 +0100
    Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available") Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-24 01:30 +0100
  Bug#1128861: Revert 18744bc56b0ec appears to resolve it Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me> - 2026-02-24 01:50 +0100
  Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me> - 2026-02-24 03:20 +0100
    Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me> - 2026-02-24 14:00 +0100
    Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> - 2026-02-27 11:10 +0100
      Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2026-03-04 11:40 +0100
    Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> - 2026-03-04 16:50 +0100
  Processed: Re: Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in  nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2026-03-04 11:40 +0100
  Bug#1128861: [PATCH] lockd: fix TEST handling when not all permissions are available. Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2026-03-25 21:40 +0100
  Bug#1128861: [PATCH v2] lockd: fix TEST handling when not all permissions are available. Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@debian.org> - 2026-04-01 15:00 +0200

csiph-web