Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Chris Hofstaedtler Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.kernel Subject: Bug#1135729: Consider disabling CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_* Date: Wed, 06 May 2026 13:40:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Salvatore Bonaccorso , 1135729@bugs.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Wed May 6 11:37:09 2026 Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.699 Reply-To: Chris Hofstaedtler , 1135729@bugs.debian.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Cc: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org X-Debian-Pr-Message: followup 1135729 X-Debian-Pr-Package: src:linux X-Debian-Pr-Keywords: moreinfo security X-Debian-Pr-Source: linux MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Debian-User: zeha X-Debian-Message: from BTS X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1968153 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 31 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 13:35:34 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1292461 linux.debian.kernel:92328 Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 src:util-linux Control: retitle -2 util-linux: drop AF_ALG support Control: forwarded -2 https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/4329 On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 08:22:26AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 11:20:17AM +0200, Chris Hofstädtler wrote: > > people claim that the crypto API is a source of security issues when > > (mis-)used by user space. LWN commenters on the recent algif_aead > > issue have some more notes: > > https://lwn.net/Articles/1070682/ [..] > > So it appears there are some tradeoffs to be made. Please take a > > look and consider turning the crypto user api off. > > That will be up for further discussion in the kernel-team meeting. I > wonder if we already can do that. There was the following follup as > well from Eric: > https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/06/5 Thanks, that is indeed useful commentary. > Will iwd still work if we disable i now? Needs to be seen, I think. For u-l I've asked upstream to drop the AF_ALG stuff, as it seems completely non-critical. Best, Chris