Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel > #114590
| From | "Josh Triplett" <josh@joshtriplett.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel |
| Subject | Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? |
| Date | 2024-12-05 22:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <JQrTr-e0bV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <JQmh4-dWz4-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <JQnPQ-dXIW-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <JQoLT-dYhO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JQrgJ-dZXW-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <JQrJL-e081-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 01:02:29PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: >> https://bugs.debian.org/1089110 > > I've looked at this bug, but unlessed I missed something, this seems > to be "rm -rf /usr/share/locale" shouldn't cause binaries to core > dump. I'm guessing this is the reason for the "beware of the leopard" > vibe in the documentation of localepurge package? I didn't realize > binaries would be so ill-behaved as to crash if the locale files were > missing. Sigh... This policy proposal does even less than that; it just says that packages must not require files on /usr/share/locale *when using a C or C.UTF-8 locale*. It makes no promises about other configurations. > Perhaps we should have a separate debian policy proposal which > explicitly makes a requirement that the locale files should be > separated for anything installed by default by debootstrap, and what > the dependency priority of the *-l10n package should be? We could. On the other hand, with the policy update I've proposed, we could also endorse the use of dpkg exclusions for this instead.
Back to linux.debian.devel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> - 2024-12-05 16:50 +0100
Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? sre4ever@free.fr - 2024-12-05 17:50 +0100
Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2024-12-05 18:30 +0100
Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> - 2024-12-05 19:30 +0100
Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2024-12-05 22:10 +0100
Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> - 2024-12-05 22:40 +0100
Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? "Josh Triplett" <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2024-12-05 22:50 +0100
Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> - 2024-12-05 23:20 +0100
Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2024-12-05 23:50 +0100
Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? Marc Haber <mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de> - 2024-12-06 07:30 +0100
Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? Stephan Verbücheln <verbuecheln@posteo.de> - 2024-12-06 13:00 +0100
Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? Jeremy Bícha <jeremy.bicha@canonical.com> - 2024-12-06 13:40 +0100
Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2024-12-07 12:50 +0100
Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org> - 2024-12-07 16:30 +0100
Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org> - 2024-12-05 23:10 +0100
Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2024-12-07 00:00 +0100
Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> - 2024-12-05 21:20 +0100
Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? "Josh Triplett" <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2024-12-05 22:50 +0100
Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? Sune Vuorela <nospam@vuorela.dk> - 2024-12-06 10:30 +0100
Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests? Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2024-12-06 17:40 +0100
csiph-web