Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.usenet.ovh!news.corradoroberto.it!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Chris Hofstaedtler Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.devel,linux.debian.devel.testing Subject: Bug#1109119: upgrade-reports: systemctl occasionally fails loading libcrypto.so Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 02:50:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Helmut Grohne , 1109119@bugs.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Thu Jul 24 00:45:07 2025 Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.999 Reply-To: Chris Hofstaedtler , 1109119@bugs.debian.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Cc: Debian Testing Group X-Debian-Pr-Message: followup 1109119 X-Debian-Pr-Package: upgrade-reports MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Debian-User: zeha X-Debian-Message: from BTS X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1915010 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 18 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 02:43:27 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <20250711171142.GA801166__32151.6230281972$1752254020$gmane$org@subdivi.de> <868qku2xlt.fsf@simplex.rtf.org.uk> <20250711171142.GA801166@subdivi.de> <20250713082925.GA945338@subdivi.de> <20250711171142.GA801166@subdivi.de> <20250713082925.GA945338@subdivi.de> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1253738 linux.debian.devel:118077 linux.debian.devel.testing:1459 On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 10:29:25AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 12:36:20AM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > I was somewhat hoping this is caused by the existing upgrade issue which > > Helmut is working on AFAIU. Was it proven that this is not the same problem? > > I believe this is independent and I merely caught it as I was carefully > reading test results for your other issue. This particular one is solely > caused by libssl3 having done a t64 transition when it was not > appropriate to do so. I do not expect my proposed change to glibc to > improve the situation regarding systemctl. Is this problem still happening? If so, are there any ideas on what to do about it? Chris