Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > linux.debian.devel.cd > #8074
| From | "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel.cd, linux.debian.devel |
| Subject | Dropping live image generation and testing for oldstable ? |
| Date | 2026-01-10 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <MbKtH-9yue-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Apologies for the multiple lists but this needs to be widespread: Currently testing CD/BD and so on images for the Trixie and Bookworm release. The question has come up: The images team do not consider that it is worthwhile generating live images for oldstable and testing live images for oldstable with each new point release. The likelihood of *needing* live images for oldstable is small and the amount of testing is large. For the expected use case, does the testing effort outweigh the actual expected use? What do others think? With every good wish, as ever, Andrew Cater (amacater@debian.org) For the team currently testing images for release.
Back to linux.debian.devel.cd | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Dropping live image generation and testing for oldstable ? "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2026-01-10 18:00 +0100
Re: Dropping live image generation and testing for oldstable ? Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org> - 2026-01-11 00:10 +0100
Re: Dropping live image generation and testing for oldstable ? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2026-01-12 00:50 +0100
Re: Dropping live image generation and testing for oldstable ? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2026-01-12 01:40 +0100
csiph-web