Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > linux.debian.devel.cd > #8074

Dropping live image generation and testing for oldstable ?

From "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.devel.cd, linux.debian.devel
Subject Dropping live image generation and testing for oldstable ?
Date 2026-01-10 18:00 +0100
Message-ID <MbKtH-9yue-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Apologies for the multiple lists but this needs to be widespread:

Currently testing CD/BD and so on images for the Trixie and Bookworm
release. The question has come up:

The images team do not consider that it is worthwhile generating live images
for oldstable and testing live images for oldstable
with each new point release.

The likelihood of *needing* live images for oldstable is small and the
amount of testing is large. For the expected use case, does the
testing effort outweigh the actual expected use?

What do others think?

With every good wish, as ever,

Andrew Cater
(amacater@debian.org)
For the team currently testing images for release.

Back to linux.debian.devel.cd | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

Dropping live image generation and testing for oldstable ? "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2026-01-10 18:00 +0100
  Re: Dropping live image generation and testing for oldstable ? Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org> - 2026-01-11 00:10 +0100
    Re: Dropping live image generation and testing for oldstable ? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2026-01-12 00:50 +0100
  Re: Dropping live image generation and testing for oldstable ? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2026-01-12 01:40 +0100

csiph-web