Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1231865 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-02-05 14:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2025-02-05 21:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#1087512: ITS: checksecurity Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2025-02-05 14:20 +0100
Bug#1087512: ITS: checksecurity Richard Lewis <richard.lewis.debian@googlemail.com> - 2025-02-05 19:30 +0100
Bug#1087512: Uploaded fix for #1092611 to delayed=5 (Was: Bug#1087512: ITS: checksecurity) Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2025-02-05 21:40 +0100
| From | Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-05 14:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#1087512: ITS: checksecurity |
| Message-ID | <KcNtT-eBgv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Richard, Am Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:41:37AM +0000 schrieb Richard Lewis: > On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 at 10:39, Richard Lewis > <richard.lewis.debian@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 at 18:48, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino <jfs@debian.org> wrote: > > > > > Similarly to what Andreas proposed, I'm happy to sponsor changes to this software and co-maintain the package. Since the source code is now available in Salsa, I would suggest you propose you incorporate the local changes directly into the latest version uploaded (2.0.17, just uploaded today). I'm happy to prepare a new 2.0.18 with all your local changes > > > > > > > I have now done this -- just submitted > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/checksecurity/-/merge_requests/1 > > > > There's obviously quite a bit in there, but happy to discuss/change any of it > > Meanwhile, checksecurity got dropped from testing due to the piuparts > failures - that is fixed in the MR, so would it be possible to take a > look soon. i could do a smaller MR if that would unblock this? Thanks a lot for your MR. If you provide a *dedicated* MR just fixing the problem of this bug report I'd happily step in to accept it and upload in case Javier might have some time constraints. In general I understood Javier keeps on maintaining this package and he is way more competent to review your large MR. Kind regards and thanks again for your commitment Andreas. -- https://fam-tille.de
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Lewis <richard.lewis.debian@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-05 19:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <KcSjT-eEpQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1231865 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 13:14, Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> wrote: > Am Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:41:37AM +0000 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 at 10:39, Richard Lewis > > <richard.lewis.debian@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/checksecurity/-/merge_requests/1 > > > Meanwhile, checksecurity got dropped from testing due to the piuparts > > failures - that is fixed in the MR, so would it be possible to take a > > look soon. i could do a smaller MR if that would unblock this? > > Thanks a lot for your MR. If you provide a *dedicated* MR just fixing > the problem of this bug report I'd happily step in to accept it and > upload in case Javier might have some time constraints. In general I > understood Javier keeps on maintaining this package and he is way more > competent to review your large MR. > > > Smaller MR submitted, https://salsa.debian.org/debian/checksecurity/-/merge_requests/2 I think it is enough to get back into testing I will rebase the other MR onto this.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-05 21:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#1087512: Uploaded fix for #1092611 to delayed=5 (Was: Bug#1087512: ITS: checksecurity) |
| Message-ID | <KcUlI-eFEY-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1231894 |
Control: tags -1 pending Thanks, Hi Richard, thanks for the patch fixing the specific error #1092611. I merged the MR and uploaded to delayed=5 which leaves a chance to cancel the upload until the weekend. Kind regards Andreas. Am Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 06:22:47PM +0000 schrieb Richard Lewis: > On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 13:14, Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> wrote: > > > Am Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:41:37AM +0000 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > > On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 at 10:39, Richard Lewis > > > <richard.lewis.debian@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/checksecurity/-/merge_requests/1 > > > > > > > > > > Meanwhile, checksecurity got dropped from testing due to the piuparts > > > failures - that is fixed in the MR, so would it be possible to take a > > > look soon. i could do a smaller MR if that would unblock this? > > > > Thanks a lot for your MR. If you provide a *dedicated* MR just fixing > > the problem of this bug report I'd happily step in to accept it and > > upload in case Javier might have some time constraints. In general I > > understood Javier keeps on maintaining this package and he is way more > > competent to review your large MR. > > > > > > > Smaller MR submitted, > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/checksecurity/-/merge_requests/2 > I think it is enough to get back into testing > > I will rebase the other MR onto this. -- https://fam-tille.de
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist
csiph-web