Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1291352

Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses?

Path csiph.com!pasdenom.info!newsfeed.bofh.team!news.nntp4.net!news.hispagatos.org!srl.newsdeef.eu!news.corradoroberto.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel, linux.debian.policy
Subject Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses?
Date Tue, 28 Apr 2026 20:20:01 +0200
Message-ID <MOVcl-15ZP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <MOuc9-NP8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MOvKV-OVD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MOMVr-10rU-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <MONy9-10Wi-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <MONRw-113w-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <MOPJD-12k0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MOvKV-OVD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MOQFI-12WW-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <MOvKV-OVD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MOTDz-14Ra-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <v1ZCh-6db-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <MOTDz-14Ra-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>, 1135097@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Tue Apr 28 18:17:08 2026
Old-Return-Path <debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
X-Spam-Flag NO
X-Spam-Score -1.699
Reply-To Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>, 885698@bugs.debian.org
Resent-To debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Cc debian-policy@lists.debian.org
X-Debian-Pr-Message followup 885698
X-Debian-Pr-Package debian-policy
X-Debian-Pr-Source debian-policy
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition inline
X-Debian-User zeha
X-Debian-Message from BTS
X-Mailing-List <debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1966621
List-ID <debian-bugs-dist.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist/>
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 25
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>, 885698@bugs.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Tue, 28 Apr 2026 20:15:50 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <afD5Vot9uAvBjWYx@per.namespace.at>
X-Original-References <ae9jLZrkpq63ScpA@nuc> <177730221960.1269501.13122065136616793622.reportbug@view-localhost> <87mrynsapb.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <afCHODABbl2OVoZn@layer-acht.org> <87cxzj754l.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <f5c7c3d2-0d0c-4a3e-bf5e-fe471e876c2d@pblackman.plus.com> <177730221960.1269501.13122065136616793622.reportbug@view-localhost> <afC1Kltb1E6flgC-@nuc> <177730221960.1269501.13122065136616793622.reportbug@view-localhost> <87lde7120r.fsf@hope.eyrie.org> <87608pvp6v.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <87lde7120r.fsf@hope.eyrie.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1291352 linux.debian.devel:121727 linux.debian.policy:9330

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 09:29:56AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
[..]
> Folks who actively work on embedded Debian should of course feel free to
> correct me, but my recollection of past discussions is that they had
> roughly the same position.
> 
> I think even in the worst case scenario of a system with a ton of Debian
> chroots, the incremental size here is highly unlikely to be a significant
> factor compared to, e.g., normal growth in the size of the utilities in
> the base image.

> And of course the local system administrator can always
> rm -r /usr/share/common-licenses if they really want to.
> (I doubt anything
> important uses files there at runtime.)

It might be sensible to have policy allow for this, and thus require 
that no packages *use* these files during their normal operation 
(and also not in maintscripts, etc).

Except maybe for tools explicitly designed to operate on them (say, 
license checkers, devscripts). I hope there is pre-established 
wording in policy that could be reused for such an exception.

Chris

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> - 2026-04-27 17:10 +0200
  Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-04-27 22:50 +0200
    Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 08:40 +0200
  Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-04-27 23:00 +0200
  Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-04-28 10:10 +0200
  Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 11:30 +0200
  Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2026-04-28 12:20 +0200
    Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Peter Blackman <peter@pblackman.plus.com> - 2026-04-28 14:30 +0200
      Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 14:40 +0200
        Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 15:40 +0200
      Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 15:30 +0200
        Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 18:40 +0200
          Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 20:20 +0200
        Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-04-29 11:50 +0200
          Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> - 2026-04-29 12:10 +0200
            Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-04-29 12:20 +0200
          Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2026-04-29 19:50 +0200
    Re: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Salvo Tomaselli <tiposchi@tiscali.it> - 2026-04-28 22:20 +0200
      Re: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in  /usr/share/common-licenses? Andreas Metzler <ametzler@bebt.de> - 2026-04-29 06:40 +0200
  Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2026-04-28 12:20 +0200
  Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 13:20 +0200
    Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2026-04-28 16:20 +0200
    Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2026-04-30 14:00 +0200
      Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> - 2026-05-01 16:30 +0200
        Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2026-05-01 17:10 +0200
          Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> - 2026-05-02 04:30 +0200

csiph-web