Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it>
Newsgroups: it.comp.os.linux.sys
Subject: Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd  & firewalld vs nftable
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 08:50:12 +0100
Organization: bitit.it
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <20250303085012.734c8c8f@bitit.it>
References: <20250228122558.2a5aae13@bitit.it> <vptavo$3r4ve$2@dont-email.me> <20250302173137.3d89b350@bitit.it> <vq2cm5$tpnr$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 08:50:13 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1b6055249478119e962b1a36d2ec8301"; logging-data="1321023"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19mUxKayFwnW93fjO+eW+uZ"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:85ZyNxBupzTZNITZjPf2OOqZSSk=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-mageia-linux-gnu)
Xref: csiph.com it.comp.os.linux.sys:45384

=20
>=20
> Sinceramente capisco sia una risposta inutile ma non so cosa dire.
> Tutti gli articoli che confrontano questi e altri daemon ftp sono di
> dieci / quindici anni fa, se non pi=C3=B9.

non
direi=20
https://www.enginyring.com/en/blog/what-are-the-differences-between-proftpd=
-vsftpd-and-pureftpd-and-when-to-use-each